| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 27.07.10 16:08l 1093 Lines 28523 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5321
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 321
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 100727/1354Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:9372 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5321
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Duplex HTs (Randy Hall)
2. Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500 (David Wing)
3. Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500 (w4upd)
4. Re: Duplex HTs (Glenn AA5PK)
5. Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500 (Glenn AA5PK)
6. Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500 (w4upd)
7. Re: Duplex HTs (John Geiger)
8. Re: Duplex HTs (Andrew Glasbrenner)
9. Re: Duplex HTs (John Geiger)
10. Re: video: program to burn TLEs onto doppler-tuning
microcontroller (Gary "Joe" Mayfield)
11. Re: Duplex HTs (John Belstner)
12. Re: Duplex HTs (Gary "Joe" Mayfield)
13. Heroic Space video (andy thomas)
14. Re: Duplex HTs (STeve Andre')
15. Re: Duplex HTs (Joe)
16. Re: Duplex HTs (Bruce Robertson)
17. Re: Duplex HTs (John Geiger)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:37:16 -0700
From: Randy Hall <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=t-aK6AYop2sEqyrhkwT2bR3wcgVWZENjQu4uR@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi
I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to use on AO-51.
Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves coming back from
the satellite.
So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty FT-51 does!
Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector anymore? I
really do not like SMAs on my radios.
Thanks
Randy
K7AGE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:12:16 -0700
From: "David Wing" <david@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500
To: "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <001b01cb2d20$5f4a7670$1ddf6350$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is there any reason why the 5400 would be a very poor choice as opposed to
the 5500?
The Yaesu site no longer references the 5400.does anyone know when they
stopped manufacturing them? If anyone has the manual for the 5400 in
electronic format, could you send it to me?
Thanks,
David
K6CDW
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:20:10 -0400
From: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500
To: David Wing <david@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4C4E263A.9000208@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
There are two models of the 65400 and the parts IPB are different for
each. Do you know which you need? I can send you both, but it will make
for a couple of fair sized attachments.
Reid, W4UPD
David Wing wrote:
> Is there any reason why the 5400 would be a very poor choice as opposed to
> the 5500?
>
>
>
> The Yaesu site no longer references the 5400.does anyone know when they
> stopped manufacturing them? If anyone has the manual for the 5400 in
> electronic format, could you send it to me?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> K6CDW
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:21:38 -0500
From: "Glenn AA5PK" <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <7D531284661B4751B949CCA11C11A183@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
>From a previous discussion, same topic, an extensive list of full-duplex
rigs may be found here:
http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Hall" <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
> Hi
>
> I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to use on AO-51.
> Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves coming back from
> the satellite.
>
> So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
>
> Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty FT-51 does!
>
> Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector anymore? I
> really do not like SMAs on my radios.
>
> Thanks
>
> Randy
> K7AGE
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:23:39 -0500
From: "Glenn AA5PK" <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500
To: "David Wing" <david@xxxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <317234220144475D9C0A15D5C25507A8@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Here it is: http://www.foxdelta.com/products/satellite/G5400_G5600.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Wing" <david@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:12 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500
> Is there any reason why the 5400 would be a very poor choice as opposed to
> the 5500?
>
>
>
> The Yaesu site no longer references the 5400.does anyone know when they
> stopped manufacturing them? If anyone has the manual for the 5400 in
> electronic format, could you send it to me?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> K6CDW
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:23:39 -0400
From: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400 vs G-5500
To: David Wing <david@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4C4E270B.9090102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If you go to my site:
http://www.bristor-assoc.com/Pictures/Amateur/G5400.zip
You'll find a file that I think contains both manuals, various pictures
and other useful information.
Reid, W4UPD
David Wing wrote:
> Is there any reason why the 5400 would be a very poor choice as opposed to
> the 5500?
>
>
>
> The Yaesu site no longer references the 5400.does anyone know when they
> stopped manufacturing them? If anyone has the manual for the 5400 in
> electronic format, could you send it to me?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> K6CDW
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <771652.22152.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't
think the IC-32AT is either.
73s John AA5JG
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 7:21 PM
> >From a previous discussion, same
> topic, an extensive list of full-duplex rigs may be found
> here:
>
> http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Hall" <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to
> use on AO-51.
> > Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves
> coming back from
> > the satellite.
> >
> > So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
> >
> > Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty
> FT-51 does!
> >
> > Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector
> anymore?? I
> > really do not like SMAs on my radios.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Randy
> > K7AGE
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:05:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx AA5PK
<aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<8148434.1280196302402.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-----Original Message-----
>From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
>Sent: Jul 26, 2010 9:35 PM
>To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
>
>A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't
think the IC-32AT is either.
>
>73s John AA5JG
>
Check out page 3 of the IC-24at manual, page 6 of the PDF
http://www.repeater-builder.com/icom/pdfs/icom-ic-24at-et-inst-manual.pdf
I owned a 32AT for many years, it is also full duplex.
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>,
amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <505512.13272.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I wasn't aware of that. Guess the fact that it didn't do dual receive or
have dual displays fooled me. In that case, I think the Icom T21A would
also work as it will do full duplex, but can't transmit on 70cm, but it
would work in Mode J. Think the Kenwood TH28A is the same.
73s John AA5JG
--- On Mon, 7/26/10, Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> To: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx "Glenn AA5PK"
<aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 9:05 PM
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
> >Sent: Jul 26, 2010 9:35 PM
> >To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx
> Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> >Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> >
> >A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom
> 24AT, and I don't think the IC-32AT is either.
> >
> >73s John AA5JG
> >
>
> Check out page 3 of the IC-24at manual, page 6 of the PDF
>
> http://www.repeater-builder.com/icom/pdfs/icom-ic-24at-et-inst-manual.pdf
>
>
> I owned a 32AT for many years, it is also full duplex.
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:43:54 -0500
From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: video: program to burn TLEs onto
doppler-tuning microcontroller
To: "'Bruce Robertson'" <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>, "'AMSAT-BB'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL114-DS24D163509FAB75137CFDA28AA70@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Bruce,
That would be cool, an HT that tells you where the bird is!
Sign Me Up!
Joe kk0sd
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Robertson [mailto:ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:23 AM
To: Gary Joe Mayfield
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: video: program to burn TLEs onto doppler-tuning
microcontroller
Thanks, Joe --
I guess an important distinction is that the trakbox did rotor
control, and my project doesn't. Rather, it aims to be useful to a
person in the field using hand-held equipment. In fact, ultimately,
I'd like to see code like this built into the firmware of an HT like
the TH-D7A.
73,
Bruce
VE9QRP
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Gary "Joe" Mayfield
<gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Cool! ?Trakbox lives again!!!
>
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
> Behalf Of Bruce Robertson
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 8:51 PM
> To: AMSAT-BB
> Subject: [amsat-bb] video: program to burn TLEs onto doppler-tuning
> microcontroller
>
> Some of you know about my qrptracker project, which is aiming at a
> compact, microcontroller-based doppler tuning device for use in the
> field. My previous videos showed an FT-817 controlled by this device
> and using a small speaker and CW to announce the bird. I've just
> posted a video to YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/VE9QRP that
> demonstrates the program that is used to load TLEs into the
> microcontroller, sync the tracker, etc. It also shows the
> microcontroller tuning a TH-D7A handheld, and it shows a LCD display.
> My goal now is to make an altoids-tin-sized package that connects to a
> TH-D7A or an FT-817, has an LCD display and provides doppler tuning.
>
> In further developments in this project, ?I've worked on porting the
> SGP4 algorithm to the ATMega644p. (Currently the project uses the
> Plan13 algorithm.)It's not an exact port, since the 'double' data type
> is not the same length, but with some careful hand-crafting, we're
> getting accuracies down to 1/10th of a degree lat and long.
> sub-satellite point.
>
> 73, Bruce
> VE9QRP
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:51:03 -0700
From: John Belstner <jbelstner@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <740C5D2C-3A23-47BA-BF9D-89462BC6A08A@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Check out June 1991 QST Product Review.
Alinco DJ-560T
Icom IC-32AT
Kenwood TH-77A
Standard C228A
Yaesu FT-470
All capable of Full Duplex operation, all with BNC antenna connections.
Only the IC-32AT does not have dual display and is not capable of
simultaneous dual-band receive.
John Belstner, W9EN
Valley Center, CA DM13le
W9EN@xxxxx.xxx
On Jul 26, 2010, at 7:27 PM, John Geiger wrote:
> I wasn't aware of that. Guess the fact that it didn't do dual receive or
have dual displays fooled me. In that case, I think the Icom T21A would
also work as it will do full duplex, but can't transmit on 70cm, but it
would work in Mode J. Think the Kenwood TH28A is the same.
>
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
>> To: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx "Glenn AA5PK"
<aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>> Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 9:05 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
>>> Sent: Jul 26, 2010 9:35 PM
>>> To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx
>> Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
>>>
>>> A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom
>> 24AT, and I don't think the IC-32AT is either.
>>>
>>> 73s John AA5JG
>>>
>>
>> Check out page 3 of the IC-24at manual, page 6 of the PDF
>>
>> http://www.repeater-builder.com/icom/pdfs/icom-ic-24at-et-inst-manual.pdf
>>
>>
>> I owned a 32AT for many years, it is also full duplex.
>>
>> 73, Drew KO4MA
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:49:55 -0500
From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL114-DS1107990923D994B8954D898AA70@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
He can take the ? off the FT 4700. I made many full duplex satellite
contacts with one.
73,
Joe kk0sd
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Andrew Glasbrenner
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:05 PM
To: John Geiger; AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Glenn AA5PK
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
-----Original Message-----
>From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
>Sent: Jul 26, 2010 9:35 PM
>To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxxx Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
>
>A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't
think the IC-32AT is either.
>
>73s John AA5JG
>
Check out page 3 of the IC-24at manual, page 6 of the PDF
http://www.repeater-builder.com/icom/pdfs/icom-ic-24at-et-inst-manual.pdf
I owned a 32AT for many years, it is also full duplex.
73, Drew KO4MA
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:38:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Heroic Space video
To: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <908802.80340.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Heroic Space Video at:
http://www.sick-solutions-tour.com/
take the Trailer (right hand button)
73 de andy G0SFJ
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:30:21 -0400
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <201007270630.21643.andres@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The ic-32at is indeed full duplex. Can't say about the 24at as mine isn't
working right now.
On Monday 26 July 2010 21:35:34 John Geiger wrote:
> A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't
> think the IC-32AT is either.
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > From: Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> > To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> > Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 7:21 PM
> >
> > >From a previous discussion, same
> >
> > topic, an extensive list of full-duplex rigs may be found
> > here:
> >
> > http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Randy Hall" <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
> > To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to
> >
> > use on AO-51.
> >
> > > Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves
> >
> > coming back from
> >
> > > the satellite.
> > >
> > > So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
> > >
> > > Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty
> >
> > FT-51 does!
> >
> > > Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector
> >
> > anymore?? I
> >
> > > really do not like SMAs on my radios.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Randy
> > > K7AGE
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
--
STeve Andre'
Disease Control Warden
Dept. of Political Science
Michigan State University
A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear incident.
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:33:17 -0400
From: Joe <jbarkley@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: Randy Hall <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4C4EB5ED.4010101@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
My IC-w32A works great for the FM sats
Joe
KI4TZ
Randy Hall wrote:
> Hi
>
> I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to use on AO-51.
> Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves coming back from
> the satellite.
>
> So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
>
> Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty FT-51 does!
>
> Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector anymore? I
> really do not like SMAs on my radios.
>
> Thanks
>
> Randy
> K7AGE
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:26:04 -0300
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=zxKiPdh1zoHrFLpc878r5ydRZA_pp-5eGmBc9@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Might I expand this discussion a bit?
As you might know, I'm working on doppler tuning portable radios. So
I'd love to know which HTs or mobile radios are sufficiently
CAT-controllable. My TH-D7A works well, and I assume the TM-700 would
as well; but looking at manuals, etc., I can't seem to find others
that would work. Am I missing any?
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:30 AM, STeve Andre' <andres@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> The ic-32at is indeed full duplex. ?Can't say about the 24at as mine isn't
> working right now.
>
> On Monday 26 July 2010 21:35:34 John Geiger wrote:
>> A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the Icom 24AT, and I don't
>> think the IC-32AT is either.
>>
>> 73s John AA5JG
>>
>> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> > From: Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
>> > To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
>> > Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 7:21 PM
>> >
>> > >From a previous discussion, same
>> >
>> > topic, an extensive list of full-duplex rigs may be found
>> > here:
>> >
>> > http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Randy Hall" <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
>> > To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
>> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM
>> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I receive emails all time from guys looking for HTs to
>> >
>> > use on AO-51.
>> >
>> > > Many want duplex HTs to allow them to hear themselves
>> >
>> > coming back from
>> >
>> > > the satellite.
>> > >
>> > > So, what of the current HTs provide duplex operation?
>> > >
>> > > Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know my trusty
>> >
>> > FT-51 does!
>> >
>> > > Plus as a bonus, any of these come with BNC connector
>> >
>> > anymore?? I
>> >
>> > > really do not like SMAs on my radios.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Randy
>> > > K7AGE
>> > >
>> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
>
>
> --
> STeve Andre'
> Disease Control Warden
> Dept. of Political Science
> Michigan State University
>
> A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear incident.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
To: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>, Bruce Robertson
<ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <507824.55854.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I think the list that we were given the link to forgot a couple of others:
Icom W21AT
Icom X21AT (70cm/1.2g)
Kenwood TH89 (70cm/1.2G)
Alinco DJ560
And quite a few by Standard
--- On Tue, 7/27/10, Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> To: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
> Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 8:26 AM
> Might I expand this discussion a
> bit?
>
> As you might know, I'm working on doppler tuning portable
> radios. So
> I'd love to know which HTs or mobile radios are
> sufficiently
> CAT-controllable. My TH-D7A works well, and I assume the
> TM-700 would
> as well; but looking at manuals, etc., I can't seem to find
> others
> that would work. Am I missing? any?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:30 AM, STeve Andre' <andres@xxx.xxx>
> wrote:
> > The ic-32at is indeed full duplex. ?Can't say about
> the 24at as mine isn't
> > working right now.
> >
> > On Monday 26 July 2010 21:35:34 John Geiger wrote:
> >> A couple on his list are not full duplex, like the
> Icom 24AT, and I don't
> >> think the IC-32AT is either.
> >>
> >> 73s John AA5JG
> >>
> >> --- On Mon, 7/26/10, Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> wrote:
> >> > From: Glenn AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> >> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Duplex HTs
> >> > To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
> >> > Date: Monday, July 26, 2010, 7:21 PM
> >> >
> >> > >From a previous discussion, same
> >> >
> >> > topic, an extensive list of full-duplex rigs
> may be found
> >> > here:
> >> >
> >> > http://thathamkid.com/fd_radios.html
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Randy Hall" <listk7age@xxxxx.xxx>
> >> > To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
> >> > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 6:37 PM
> >> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Duplex HTs
> >> >
> >> > > Hi
> >> > >
> >> > > I receive emails all time from guys
> looking for HTs to
> >> >
> >> > use on AO-51.
> >> >
> >> > > Many want duplex HTs to allow them to
> hear themselves
> >> >
> >> > coming back from
> >> >
> >> > > the satellite.
> >> > >
> >> > > So, what of the current HTs provide
> duplex operation?
> >> > >
> >> > > Which of the older HTs do duplex. I know
> my trusty
> >> >
> >> > FT-51 does!
> >> >
> >> > > Plus as a bonus, any of these come with
> BNC connector
> >> >
> >> > anymore?? I
> >> >
> >> > > really do not like SMAs on my radios.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > >
> >> > > Randy
> >> > > K7AGE
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HfvmU_utI8
> >
> >
> > --
> > STeve Andre'
> > Disease Control Warden
> > Dept. of Political Science
> > Michigan State University
> >
> > A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear
> incident.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 321
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
