| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 09.06.10 20:11l 161 Lines 5096 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5260
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 260
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<OK0PPL<OK0NAG<9A0BBS<VE2PKT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 100609/1904Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:65165 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5260
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Tracking Falcon 9's Dragon Payload In Real Time (Rocky Jones)
2. TS2000 on dualband antenna (for sat work) (John Geiger)
3. F9/Dragon keps (Andrew Glasbrenner)
4. Re: Cross Devices Stuf (Bill Booth)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:58:19 -0500
From: Rocky Jones <orbitjet@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tracking Falcon 9's Dragon Payload In Real
Time
To: <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, <top_gun_canada@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL106-W36D6D4099A1EBA6119560BD6D60@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Bill. there are none now. The vehicle was powered in total by batteries
(second stage and the Dragon mockup) and they have expired. The vehicle is
essentially inert now. Decay is expected about 21 June give or take. Next
launch with a full up Dragon is this summer. They have some roll control
issues to deal with and a few other things...Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life
member AMSAT ARRL
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:25:38 -0700
> From: bill@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
> To: top_gun_canada@xxxxx.xxx
> CC: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tracking Falcon 9's Dragon Payload In Real Time
>
> Does anyone have any idea if there are any signals to track?
>
> Regards...Bill - N6GHz
>
> B J wrote:
> > http://www.n2yo.com/?s=36595
> >
> > 73s
> >
> > Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with
Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326
::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS2000 on dualband antenna (for sat work)
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <394654.61735.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone on the list tried using a Kenwood TS2000 on full duplex satellite
operatation using a dualband VHF/UHF antenna and a diplexer? Is it possible
or is there too much desensitization thru the diplexer to make full duplex
work?
73s John AA5JG
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] F9/Dragon keps
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<23898768.1276101252073.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
For those interested, and that haven't gotten their spacetrack account yet...
DRAGON/FALCON 9 R/B
1 36595U 10026A 10159.93658060 +.00296804 +40515-4 +32671-3 0 00193
2 36595 034.4967 011.8853 0020394 257.4860 102.3599 16.08080735000679
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:05:43 -0400
From: Bill Booth <ve3nxk@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cross Devices Stuf
To: Ollie Eisman <ollie@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4C0FC9E7.7030806@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 09/06/2010 12:22 AM, Ollie Eisman wrote:
> Has anyone used "Stuf" from Cross Devices to waterproof RF connectors
(with or without with coax seal)? It seems like a good idea but I wonder
how well it works in real life.
Not that brand but something similar. Used it on TV satellite, and
HughesNet Internet connectors for years. I have it on my ham stuff too
but I do not run lotsa power on HF. The only problem with it is it is
very slippery. If you are going to use coax seal or tape .... lots of
luck. I am using alcohol to clean it off these days to get the tape to
stick.
I have never had a connector go bad with it .... taped ot not.
--
Bill Booth VE3NXK
Sundridge ON, Canada
79.23.37 W x 45.46.18 N
FN05ns
Visit my weather WebCam at http://www.almaguin.com/wxcurrent/weather.html
Organ and Tissue Donation - The Gift of Life
Talk to your family. Your decision can make a difference.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 260
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
