| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 16.05.10 20:09l 272 Lines 9155 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5223
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 223
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 100516/1904Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:60028 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5223
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Icom 9100 (Alan)
2. Re: AMSAT stamps 100% to AMSAT (Clint Bradford)
3. Re: Icom 9100 (Michael Tondee)
4. SATpc32 problem (SteveBluemel@xxxxx.xxxx
5. Re: Icom 9100 (Greg D.)
6. Anyone record HO-68 pass around 0040 UTC tonight?
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
7. Re: Icom 9100 (Sebastian)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:17:27 -0500
From: "Alan" <ve4yz@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BAY110-DS28C4A14C71E4BE4799B3AEBFF0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
My 15 year old FT736R with the 1.2 module and my FT847 keep looking better -
like a fine wine aging.
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Mik Forsythe
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:22 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
Just left Dayton a few hours ago.? Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and
a 910.? It is bigger than the 910.? It was in a display case so I can't tell
you what the feel was like of the weight.? Price is in the $4,000.00 range
so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 17:22:20 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT stamps 100% to AMSAT
To: "kk5do@xxxxx.xxxx <kk5do@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <6AEADF37-7EBF-4F85-80BF-B99F1C60CD8C@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Bruce - Didn't mean to cast any doubts regarding AMSAT. But when it
comes to IRS matters, I always refer folks to THEIR OWN tax
professionals (grin).
Sent from my iPod touch.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 21:43:36 -0400
From: Michael Tondee <mat_62@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4BEF4DC8.7070707@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I guess once I put the upcoming V/U module in my Flex 5000 I'll have
that amount of money in it but I won't have had to spend it all at once
and IMHO I'll have a markedly better radio. Also one that isn't outdated
a day after I walk out of the store with it.
I'm just not a big fan of Icom's anyway so I guess I'm pretty biased.
73,
Michael, W4HIJ
On 5/15/2010 7:22 PM, Mik Forsythe wrote:
> Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600
and a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't
tell you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00
range so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2876 - Release Date: 05/15/10
14:26:00
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 02:33:38 +0000
From: SteveBluemel@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] SATpc32 problem
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <000e0cd72b1a9318d00486acef01@xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Hey all,
Problem solved. It turns out that the AMSAT kep data was bad. I downloaded
the Celestrak keps and all works great. Now, i need to figure out how keep
my kep data file accurate.
Thank you all for your suggestions, and Erich for the customer service.
Steve
KI6OQU
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:39:43 -0700
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
To: <ve4yz@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W16921B24D210ACF20DA642A9FF0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I was just thinking the same thing! (FT-736R w/ 1.2 ghz, and FT-767GX w/
6m, 2m, and 70cm modules, in my case...)
Greg KO6TH
> From: ve4yz@xxxxxxx.xxx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:17:27 -0500
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
>
> My 15 year old FT736R with the 1.2 module and my FT847 keep looking better -
> like a fine wine aging.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
> Behalf Of Mik Forsythe
> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:22 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
>
> Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and
> a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't tell
> you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00 range
> so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:
en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 21:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Patrick STODDARD \(WD9EWK/VA7EWK\)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Anyone record HO-68 pass around 0040 UTC tonight?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <350852.68731.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi!
I had a problem with my digital recorder during the HO-68 pass
around 0040 UTC this evening. I am going through what little
audio it captured trying to make my log entries, and I know I
am not remembering every call I worked. If you have a recording
of this pass and can e-mail me a copy of that recording, I would
appreciate that. The recordings for the two earlier passes on
SO-50 and FO-29 I worked at the Indiana/Ohio state line, along
with the other passes I worked on Thursday and Friday, are OK.
Thanks in advance, and 73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK - Fairborn, Ohio (near Dayton)
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 14:59:10 -0400
From: Sebastian <w4as@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <2C8CE9D3-32E5-40E4-8D74-34EEAB07B477@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I sold my IC-910H recently, as I had thoughts about going with the 9100.
But at that price, I can't justify it.
I agree that the Flex 5000 is probably a much better radio (since we don't
yet know all the technical details on the 9100). However the cost of the
V/U module for the Flex is about as much as you would pay for a brand new
TS-2000. Sure the Flex offers more, but let's face it, with the current
birds in orbit, it's overkill for the average ham who makes occasional
satellite contacts.
Perhaps others such as DEMI, will see this as an opportunity and come up
with alternatives?
73 de W4AS
On May 15, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Michael Tondee wrote:
> I guess once I put the upcoming V/U module in my Flex 5000 I'll have
> that amount of money in it but I won't have had to spend it all at once
> and IMHO I'll have a markedly better radio. Also one that isn't outdated
> a day after I walk out of the store with it.
> I'm just not a big fan of Icom's anyway so I guess I'm pretty biased.
> 73,
> Michael, W4HIJ
>
> On 5/15/2010 7:22 PM, Mik Forsythe wrote:
>> Just left Dayton a few hours ago. Icom said that it is basically a 7600
and a 910. It is bigger than the 910. It was in a display case so I can't
tell you what the feel was like of the weight. Price is in the $4,000.00
range so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 223
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
