| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 07.05.10 14:25l 800 Lines 23757 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5209
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 209
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0BEL<CX2SA
Sent: 100507/1321Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:58129 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5209
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: 70cm yagi (Clint Bradford)
2. FINAL REMINDER (Martha)
3. Re: 70cm yagi (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
4. Re: 70cm yagi (Bob- W7LRD)
5. Re: 70cm yagi (Ng, Peter)
6. Re: 70cm yagi (Clint Bradford)
7. Re: 70cm yagi (Clint Bradford)
8. Re: 70cm yagi (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
9. Re: 70cm yagi (Clint Bradford)
10. Re: 70cm yagi (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
11. Re: 70cm yagi (Clint Bradford)
12. Re: 70cm yagi (Gordon JC Pearce)
13. Re: 70cm yagi (Bob- W7LRD)
14. Re: 70cm yagi (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
15. SO-50 Frequency Jump (John Papay)
16. Ride to dinner at Dayton (Nick Pugh K5QXJ)
17. SO50 FRQ JUMP (paul robinson)
18. RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump (PY5LF)
19. Re: RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump (Jeff KB2M)
20. RES: RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump (PY5LF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 12:26:31 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <61F286AD-944B-4A4C-BEFE-33C5810E6D64@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> ... 70cm ... firestations ... EOC stations ...
You should be demanding nothing LESS than a commercial ComTelCo Yagi ...
http://www.comtelcoantennas.com/yagi_uhf.htm
Anything less and you are being irresponsible with the public you are
protecting. I mean, does your local police department and city works comms
centers have home-made Yagis on their installations? Of course not. Why
should your department think "amateur radio installations" deserve anything
less?
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 15:28:15 -0400
From: Martha <martha@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FINAL REMINDER
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<s2q956751cf1005061228k368aa3b9l12f9c52073d7cb1a@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
You MUST make your AMSAT-TAPR Dayton banquet reservations by close of
business (6:00 PM EDST) Monday, May 10th. Reservation can be made on the
AMSAT website. We will not be selling tickets at the booth. You can pick
up your tickets on Friday, May 14th at the AMSAT booth.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:47:23 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4BE31CCB.4010602@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Only because they have nobody on their staff who knows what an antenna is.
They don't pay high bucks for the fun of it.
I mean, does your local police department and city works comms centers
have home-made Yagis on their installations? Of
course not.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<5442622.14436451273176120357.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxxxxx
.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Point well taken Clint.? We do have a communication link however there have
been occasional fades.? I am just a small cog in the big wheel.? I will
advise the powers to be accordingly.
73 Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clint Bradford" <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2010 12:26:31 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
> >> ... 70cm ... firestations ... EOC stations ...
You should be demanding nothing LESS than a commercial ComTelCo Yagi ...
http://www.comtelcoantennas.com/yagi_uhf.htm
Anything less and you are being irresponsible with the public you are
protecting. I mean, does your local police department and city works comms
centers have home-made Yagis on their installations? Of course not. Why
should your department think "amateur radio installations" deserve anything
less?
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:07:30 -0700
From: "Ng, Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: "'Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF'" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>, Clint Bradford
<clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<44D6D682B38A5D4FAA2DBDE4AFD3B87D029517A7@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
...but I bet they know what liability and lost of life mean. However, not
to undermind the quality and performance of ham homebrew equipment. Some
can even be better than commercial! just my 2 cents ;)
73, Peter VE7NGP
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:47 PM
To: Clint Bradford
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
Only because they have nobody on their staff who knows what an antenna is.
They don't pay high bucks for the fun of it.
I mean, does your local police department and city works comms centers
have home-made Yagis on their installations? Of
course not.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 16:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: "Ng,Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, "'Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF'"
<nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<33273863.1273176741683.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> ... homebrew equipment. Some can even be better than commercial!
I would not live in a community where my public service departments were
depending upon homebrew comms equipment for critical emergency communications.
This is not demeaning to the amateur radio community at all. Amateur radio
should DEMAND such respect and recognition in the emergency plans of their
communities.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
----------------------------------
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.clintbradford.com
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 16:15:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<24609814.1273176932187.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> ... We do have a communication link however there have been occasional
fades ...
Then get your radio vendor out there and see why this happens. Most vendors
will send a tech out to their commercial clients at little or no charge - to
maintain your business relationship. I performed plenty of site surveys and
diagnostics for my clients while working for a Motorola dealer.
It may be as simple as one feedline deteriorating ... or moisture in just
one connector - that is causing your "occasional drops!"
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
----------------------------------
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
http://www.clintbradford.com
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 20:20:03 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "Ng,Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4BE32473.6060901@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Do you also demand commercial quality radios?
Here, it's standard amateur transceivers, antennas and power supplies.
On 06-May-10 20:12, Clint Bradford wrote:
>>> ... homebrew equipment. Some can even be better than commercial!
>
> I would not live in a community where my public service departments were
depending upon homebrew comms equipment for critical emergency communications.
>
> This is not demeaning to the amateur radio community at all. Amateur radio
should DEMAND such respect and recognition in the emergency plans of their
communities.
>
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
> 909-241-7666
>
> ----------------------------------
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
> http://www.clintbradford.com
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2856 - Release Date: 05/05/10
18:26:00
>
--
Nigel A. Gunn, 1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA. tel +1 937
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF), e-mail nigel@xxxxx.xxx www
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pigs QRP
Club International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS, ALC,
GCARES, XWARN.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:29:07 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "Ng,Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <97F65B7F-62BD-4050-9AC7-ABF1034FDFE9@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It is against FCC regulations in the United States to use amateur gear on
frequencies allocated for public service.
>> ... Do you also demand commercial quality radios?
For public safety? Absolutely.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 20:32:32 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "Ng,Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4BE32760.2060508@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
I don't think we're talking public service frequencies.
I think we're talking ARES/RACES/WARN backup on amateur bands.
On 06-May-10 20:29, Clint Bradford wrote:
> It is against FCC regulations in the United States to use amateur gear on
frequencies allocated for public service.
>
>>> ... Do you also demand commercial quality radios?
>
> For public safety? Absolutely.
>
> Clint Bradford, K6LCS
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2856 - Release Date: 05/05/10
18:26:00
>
--
Nigel A. Gunn, 1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA. tel +1 937
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF), e-mail nigel@xxxxx.xxx www
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548, Flying Pigs QRP
Club International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691, AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS, ALC,
GCARES, XWARN.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:39:27 -0700
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "Ng,Peter" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <375640DF-B23F-4979-B944-80D8A3B5A602@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The original poster used "fire department" and "EOC" comms in his original
post. That, to me, demands a "step up" in integrity of the radio system.
Those phrases, to me, mean that the safety of the public may be involved.
And that, to me, means no "homebrewed" ham antennas should be on the front
line.
Clint, K6LCS
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:50:07 +0100
From: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <1273179007.25318.14.camel@xxxxx.xxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:26 -0700, Clint Bradford wrote:
> Anything less and you are being irresponsible with the public you are
> protecting. I mean, does your local police department and city works
> comms centers have home-made Yagis on their installations? Of course
> not. Why should your department think "amateur radio installations"
> deserve anything less?
If they are wanting "mission-critical" emergency comms, then they should
be staying off the amateur bands and using the frequencies assigned to
them and equipment approved for the task.
Gordon MM0YEQ
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:51:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Peter Ng <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<45593509.14459761273179099385.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxxxx
x.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Ok! before this thread gets out of hand!
--A group of local hams has organized themselves utilizing our resources and
abilities to serve a back up communications in the event of a situation
where local authorities are overwhelmed be the event.? The local authorities
have purchased ham gear for this purpose.? We have a repeater, many
dedicated volunteers, and have regular drills in coordination with the
aforemantioned authorities.? We do not use ham gear on public service
frequencies.? One of my bumper stickers says, "when all else fails".? I am
sure someone can pick this to pieces.? However we're just volunteer hams,
not professional police, firemen etc.? When the crap hits the fan, we're
usually there, and we can and do "make do" with what we have.
End of thread
73 Bob W7LRD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clint Bradford" <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>f
To: "Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "Peter Ng" <Peter.Ng@xxxxx.xx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2010 1:29:07 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
It is against FCC regulations in the United States to use amateur gear on
frequencies allocated for public service.
>> ... Do you also demand commercial quality radios?
For public safety? Absolutely.
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:07:11 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: 70cm yagi
To: Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4BE32F7F.2050302@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
True but we're talking the US equivalent of RAYNET providing emergency
backup communications.
On 06-May-10 20:50, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
>
>
> If they are wanting "mission-critical" emergency comms, then they should
> be staying off the amateur bands and using the frequencies assigned to
> them and equipment approved for the task.
>
> Gordon MM0YEQ
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 20:07:19 -0400
From: John Papay <john@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Frequency Jump
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <887645.99137.qm@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Over the past week or two I have noticed that SO-50
is changing frequency during the pass. Today at 2308z
I made some transmissions and then noticed that my
downlink was distorted as well as the station I was
working. A change from 436.790 to 436.795 for the
center frequency (not the doppler corrected frequency)
made the audio clear again.
This has happened to me a few times now and seems to occur
once the transmitter has been on for a minute or two. Has
anyone else noticed this?
73,
John K8YSE
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 06:11:12 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Ride to dinner at Dayton
To: "'AMSAT-BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <004901caedd6$01135970$033a0c50$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am staying at the Dury at Dayton and need a ride to the AMSAT dinner.
Is there some that can help me out?
Thanks
nick
Office 337 593 8700
Cell 337 258 2527
Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:44:04 +0000 (GMT)
From: paul robinson <pushbiker2004@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO50 FRQ JUMP
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <233222.13146.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi John ,yes this problem with so50 has been abt for a while....de paul 2E1EUB
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 09:45:21 -0300
From: "PY5LF" <py5lf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump
To: "'John Papay'" <john@xxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <004801caede3$2889d080$799d7180$@xxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi John
I have also noticed this deviation in frequency since a long time.
Already put up two frequencies in the Satpc32 CAT, and 346791.0 and
436795.0
Rgds
PY5LF
LUCIANO FABRICIO
CURITIBA-PR-BRAZIL
GG54JM?
http://www.qrz.com/db/py5lf
www.falautomation.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Em nome
de John Papay
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 6 de maio de 2010 21:07
Para: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Assunto: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Frequency Jump
Over the past week or two I have noticed that SO-50
is changing frequency during the pass. Today at 2308z
I made some transmissions and then noticed that my
downlink was distorted as well as the station I was
working. A change from 436.790 to 436.795 for the
center frequency (not the doppler corrected frequency)
made the audio clear again.
This has happened to me a few times now and seems to occur
once the transmitter has been on for a minute or two. Has
anyone else noticed this?
73,
John K8YSE
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 09:04:43 -0400
From: "Jeff KB2M" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <007501caede5$dc780fb0$95682f10$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I also noticed this several years ago. I have 3 d/l freqs entered in
SatPC32. 792, 795, and 797. I don't recall having to change the d/l
lately, but I also haven't been working the birds much...
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of PY5LF
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:45 AM
To: 'John Papay'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump
Hi John
I have also noticed this deviation in frequency since a long time.
Already put up two frequencies in the Satpc32 CAT, and 346791.0 and
436795.0
Rgds
PY5LF
LUCIANO FABRICIO
CURITIBA-PR-BRAZIL
GG54JM?
http://www.qrz.com/db/py5lf
www.falautomation.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Em nome
de John Papay
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 6 de maio de 2010 21:07
Para: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Assunto: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Frequency Jump
Over the past week or two I have noticed that SO-50
is changing frequency during the pass. Today at 2308z
I made some transmissions and then noticed that my
downlink was distorted as well as the station I was
working. A change from 436.790 to 436.795 for the
center frequency (not the doppler corrected frequency)
made the audio clear again.
This has happened to me a few times now and seems to occur
once the transmitter has been on for a minute or two. Has
anyone else noticed this?
73,
John K8YSE
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 10:07:41 -0300
From: "PY5LF" <py5lf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] RES: RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <005501caede6$471bddb0$d5539910$@xxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sorry , 436791.0 and 436795.0
73
PY5LF
LUCIANO FABRICIO
CURITIBA-PR-BRAZIL
GG54JM?
http://www.qrz.com/db/py5lf
www.falautomation.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Em nome
de PY5LF
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 7 de maio de 2010 09:45
Para: 'John Papay'; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Assunto: [amsat-bb] RES: SO-50 Frequency Jump
Hi John
I have also noticed this deviation in frequency since a long time.
Already put up two frequencies in the Satpc32 CAT, and 346791.0 and
436795.0
Rgds
PY5LF
LUCIANO FABRICIO
CURITIBA-PR-BRAZIL
GG54JM?
http://www.qrz.com/db/py5lf
www.falautomation.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Em nome
de John Papay
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 6 de maio de 2010 21:07
Para: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Assunto: [amsat-bb] SO-50 Frequency Jump
Over the past week or two I have noticed that SO-50
is changing frequency during the pass. Today at 2308z
I made some transmissions and then noticed that my
downlink was distorted as well as the station I was
working. A change from 436.790 to 436.795 for the
center frequency (not the doppler corrected frequency)
made the audio clear again.
This has happened to me a few times now and seems to occur
once the transmitter has been on for a minute or two. Has
anyone else noticed this?
73,
John K8YSE
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
