| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 25.04.10 20:18l 967 Lines 25365 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB5189
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 189
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 100425/1912Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:55766 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB5189
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. SO-67 (Vincenzo Mone)
2. Re: Sounds for wisp (Gould Smith)
3. Re: SO-67 (Tony Langdon)
4. G5500 Rotor Problems (Angelo Glorioso)
5. Re: G5500 Rotor Problems (K7WIN - Jeff)
6. Re: G5500 Rotor Problems (John Price)
7. Recommendations for a good bias-t for 2M and 70 CM (Mark Lunday)
8. HO-68 Schedule - 25-02 May 2010 (Alan Kung)
9. Re: Recommendations for a good bias-t for 2M and 70 CM
(Stan, W1LE)
10. AO 27 ? (Ted)
11. Re: AO 27 ? (Greg D.)
12. Re: AO 27 ? (Andrew Glasbrenner)
13. Re: AO 27 ? (George Henry)
14. Hitting a southbound Moon (Greg D.)
15. Re: AO 27 ? (John Geiger)
16. KPC-9612+ with TS-2000 (Nathaniel S. Parsons)
17. Re: KPC-9612+ with TS-2000 (Nathaniel S. Parsons)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:44:55 +0200
From: "Vincenzo Mone" <vimone@xxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-67
To: "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAALgqrd2N1rRAiaQvRd7pgRDCgAAAEAAAAOfjfbJtkAxBvotZ7EzOmq
oBAAAAAA==@xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hello to all,
right a few seconds ago I had a good pass of SO-67
but unfortunately I did not hear nothing on
the frequency of 435.345 on FM mode.
Please I would like to know if it is alive or not.
Can I hear something?
Thanks in advance.
73 de Enzo IK8OZV
EasyLog 5 BetaTester
EasyLog PDA BetaTester
WinBollet BetaTester
D.C.I. CheckPoint Regione Campania
Skype: ik8ozv8520
***************************************
***** GSM +39 338 9749786 *****
***** SMS +39 338 9749786 *****
***** FAX +39 328 7244294 *****
*** 2nd e-mail: vimone@xxx.xx ***
***************************************
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:03:05 -0400
From: "Gould Smith" <gouldsmi@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sounds for wisp
To: "Vincenzo Mone" <vimone@xxxxx.xx>, "Amsat - BBs"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <67ACD1D14A304D789DAF53144561549F@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Enzo,
I found it easiest just to make my own using something like Audacity. I
have a number of them on the AMSAT Digital Disk, but you reminded me that I
should add some of the newer satellites.
73,
Gould, WA4SXM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincenzo Mone" <vimone@xxxxx.xx>
To: "Amsat - BBs" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:03 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sounds for wisp
> Hi folks,
> anybody has or can tell me where
> to find the wave files that announce the
> incoming satellites for the wisp program?
> I mean also the ones for the new birds
> Launched recently.
> Thanks in advanced
>
> 73 de Enzo IK8OZV
> EasyLog 5 BetaTester
> EasyLog PDA BetaTester
> WinBollet BetaTester
> D.C.I. CheckPoint Regione Campania
> Skype: ik8ozv8520
>
>
>
>
> ***************************************
> ***** GSM +39 338 9749786 *****
> ***** SMS +39 338 9749786 *****
> ***** FAX +39 328 7244294 *****
> *** 2nd e-mail: vimone@xxx.xx ***
> ***************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:06:58 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SO-67
To: "Vincenzo Mone" <vimone@xxxxx.xx>, "Amsat - BBs"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4bd3799c.1664730a.3f20.ffffbac8@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 05:44 AM 4/25/2010, Vincenzo Mone wrote:
>Hello to all,
>right a few seconds ago I had a good pass of SO-67
>but unfortunately I did not hear nothing on
>the frequency of 435.345 on FM mode.
>Please I would like to know if it is alive or not.
>Can I hear something?
SO-67 is in commissioning, and is currently not available.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:09:56 -0500
From: "Angelo Glorioso" <n5uxt@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] G5500 Rotor Problems
To: "AMSATBBS" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP7296AEC7C90C44EFF72BAED060@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
With field day coming around the corner, I took the time to work on my
spare G5500 rotor
setup. I knew from earlier this year, I had to put my spare azimuth rotor to
replace the
one that stopped working.
I took the Azimuth rotor apart and come to find out that it seems the nylon
gear that is
attached to the motor itself is slipping big time. I can manually move the
other gears and
they seem to be working fine.
I will take the rest of the rotor apart tomorrow, but I was wondering if
anyone else has come
across this problem??? Since I am unable to see without taking the rest of
the rotor
apart, anyone know how this gear is attached to the shaft of the motor??
Anyone
have any ideas where I might get another gear if necessary??
I see why Yaesu will only sell the whole motor attachment know for 200.00
plus dollars.
73 de Angelo
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:32:34 -0700
From: "K7WIN - Jeff" <k7win@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: G5500 Rotor Problems
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000301cae406$6bf893b0$43e9bb10$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Angelo,
I have a spare G5500 azimuth rotor. I can ship it to you to use for field
day. Just return when finished.
73,
Jeff - K7WIN
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:10 PM
To: AMSATBBS
Subject: [amsat-bb] G5500 Rotor Problems
With field day coming around the corner, I took the time to work on my
spare G5500 rotor
setup. I knew from earlier this year, I had to put my spare azimuth rotor to
replace the
one that stopped working.
I took the Azimuth rotor apart and come to find out that it seems the nylon
gear that is
attached to the motor itself is slipping big time. I can manually move the
other gears and
they seem to be working fine.
I will take the rest of the rotor apart tomorrow, but I was wondering if
anyone else has come
across this problem??? Since I am unable to see without taking the rest of
the rotor
apart, anyone know how this gear is attached to the shaft of the motor??
Anyone
have any ideas where I might get another gear if necessary??
I see why Yaesu will only sell the whole motor attachment know for 200.00
plus dollars.
73 de Angelo
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:20:59 -0400
From: John Price <n4qwf1@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: G5500 Rotor Problems
To: Angelo Glorioso <n5uxt@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<g2n8d1b8e81004241720m48e25735v4ff9857361a6b5f0@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
When I needed to replace the pot in my AZ rotor I contacted Yaesu a
this phone number and found them most helpful. I ordered the pot and a
few spares and replaced it without problem. Maybe you could give this
a try. It might work out for you as well.
73's << john
Parts Department (Manuals, Parts 8 am - 4 pm PST):
1-714-827-7600 parts department
(562) 404-2700
(562) 404-4828 FAX
Email : yaesuparts@xxxxxxxx.xxx
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Angelo Glorioso <n5uxt@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>
> ?With field day coming around the corner, I took the time to work on my
spare G5500 rotor
> setup. I knew from earlier this year, I had to put my spare azimuth rotor
to replace the
> one that stopped working.
>
>
> ?I took the Azimuth rotor apart and come to find out that it seems the
nylon gear that is
> attached to the motor itself is slipping big time. I can manually move the
other gears and
> they seem to be working fine.
>
> ?I will take the rest of the rotor apart ?tomorrow, but I was wondering if
anyone else has come
> across this problem??? ?Since I am unable to see without taking the rest
of the rotor
> apart, anyone know how this gear is attached to the shaft of the motor??
Anyone
> have any ideas where I might get another gear if necessary??
>
> ?I see why Yaesu will only sell the whole motor attachment know for 200.00
plus dollars.
>
>
> 73 de Angelo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
N4QWF Amateur Radio Operator
AO-7,AO-27,FO-29,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52,ISS
Email N4QWF@xxxxx.xxx
Formerly KC4AHW VK3FEZ
Amsat Member #27845
DXCC #33,478
VUCC SAT #135
WAS SAT #296
51 on AO-51 #13
LON -79.256 LAT 37.459 Grid FM07il
>From the Foothills of the Blueridge
*Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly
proclaiming - "WOW, What a ride!"
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:14:37 -0400
From: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@xx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Recommendations for a good bias-t for 2M and 70
CM
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <002101cae42d$d1a47e00$74ed7a00$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have the Bias-T units from Array Solutions, but these are intended for
160-6M (I presume because of component losses at higher frequencies).
What are folks using to power mast-mount preamps?
Mark Lunday
WD4ELG
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:50:45 +0800
From: "Alan Kung" <alankung@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 Schedule - 25-02 May 2010
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <005001cae47e$55ef9fa0$6c01a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
25 Apr. 2010
================================
17:30...Turn On--FM
India, Africa, Middle East,
Europe,NA
16:45...Turn Off
19:00...Turn On--FM
Africa,Europe,Middle East,NA
19:45...Turn Off
23:25...Turn On--FM
NA,North Asia,East Asia,Oceania
24:10...Turn Off
26 Apr. 2010
================================
01:21...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
01:34...Turn Off
02:10...Turn On--SSTV
South America,NA,North Asia
02:55...Turn Off
19:00...Turn On--SSTV
Africa,Europe,NA
19:45...Turn Off
27 Apr. 2010
================================
00:10...Turn On--FM
South America,NA,North Asia
00:55...Turn Off
01:55...Turn On--FM
South America,NA,North Asia
02:40...Turn Off
02:47...Turn On--FM
North Asia, East Asia, South Asia
03:00...Turn Off
09:15...Turn On--FM
Oceania,Asia,Europe
10:00...Turn Off
17:00...Turn On--FM
India,Middle East,Europe,NA
17:45...Turn Off
18:45...Turn On--FM
Africa,Europe,NA
19:30...Turn Off
28 Apr. 2010
=================================
02:34...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
03:50...Turn Off
10:45...Turn On--FM
Oceania,East Asia,North Asia,Europe
11:30...Turn Off
13:25...Turn On--FM
NA,South America,Europe
14:10...Turn Off
18:30...Turn On--Packet
Africa,Europe,NA
19:15...Turn Off
22:35...Turn On--Packet
NA,North Asia,East Asia,Oceania
23:20...Turn Off
29 Apr. 2010
=================================
02:16...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
02:32...Turn Off
05:50...Turn On--FM
NA,North Asia,Middle East,
Europe,Africa
06:35...Turn Off
10:30...Turn On--FM
Oceania,Asia,Europe,NA
11:15...Turn Off
16:25...Turn On--Packet
Africa,India,Middle East,Europe,NA
17:10...Turn Off
18:15...Turn On--Packet
Africa,Europe,NA
19:00...Turn Off
30 Apr. 2010
================================
00:05...Turn On--Packet
South America,NA,North Asia
00:50...Turn Off
02:00...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
02:16...Turn Off
10:15...Turn On--FM
Oceania,Asia,Europe
11:00...Turn Off
17:55...Turn On--SSTV
India,Africa,Europe,NA
18:50...Turn Off
22:00...Turn On--FM
NA,North Asia,Oceania
22:45...Turn Off
01 May 2010
================================
00:50...Turn On--Packet
South America,NA,North Asia
01:30...Turn Off
01:39...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
01:54...Turn Off
10:00...Turn On--FM
Oceania,Asia,Europe,NA
10:45...Turn Off
17:40...Turn On--FM
Africa,Europe,NA
18:25...Turn Off
02 Apr. 2010
================================
00:30...Turn On--FM
South America,NA,North Asia
01:15...Turn Off
03:16...Turn On--FM
North Asia,East Asia,South Asia
03:28...Turn Off
06:45...Turn On--FM
North Asia,Europe,Africa
07:30...Turn Off
09:40...Turn On--FM
Oceania,Asia,Europe
10:25...Turn Off
73
Alan Kung, BA1DU
HO-68(XW-1) Project Manager
www.camsat.cn
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:24:02 -0400
From: "Stan, W1LE" <stanw1le@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Recommendations for a good bias-t for 2M and
70 CM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4BD45E92.80509@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello Mark,
For my SSB Electronics preamps, I use their DC injector with sequencer.
Model DCW-15 SHF, for the 1.2 GHz mast mounted preamplifier.
For others I use a Down East Microwave DC injector.
Like their model BT-H for 900 MHz.
It has a higher RF insertion loss at 2M, where it is not designed for, ~
1-2 dB
I believe DC injectors are also made by ARR and SUHNER.
Some call them a bias tee, but they are still DC injectors/extractors.
They are a 3 port device, 2 RF ports for your frequency, one with DC,
one without.
The third port is for the DC connection, either injection or extraction.
The 2 RF ports are capacitively coupled for the DC isolation.
The DC port is connected thru a choke directly to the RF port that needs
the DC.
Not too hard to build, but the factory made connectored boxes are handy.
On one system I use the spare conductors in the AZ/ELcontrol cable for
polarization switching, PTT and DC power for the stuff on the tower.
My Yaesu G5400B only uses 6 of the 8 conductors in the control cable.
6 for AZ and 6 for EL = 4 spares.
2M pol select, 70cm pol select, common PTT (ground to TX), and DC power.
For signal and DC return, I use the big black conductor in the 8C cable.
You may consider another spare wire for signal return.
Stan, W1LE Cape Cod FN41sr
ZZZZz
On 4/25/2010 12:14 AM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> I have the Bias-T units from Array Solutions, but these are intended for
> 160-6M (I presume because of component losses at higher frequencies).
>
> What are folks using to power mast-mount preamps?
>
> Mark Lunday
> WD4ELG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:06:22 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO 27 ?
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <000001cae499$a440a670$ecc1f350$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
AMSAT shows downlink at 436.795
AO27 site shows downlink at 436.797
What is the correct frequency?
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:52:06 -0700
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO 27 ?
To: <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W175FB4544AD4691EBADB3DA9050@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I find that 436.795 works best for me. But it's an FM downlink (so you have
the capture effect on your side), you've got Doppler to deal with, and every
rig is different anyway. So I'd advise that you just play with it a bit and
see what's best for you. Either one is a reasonable starting point.
Greg KO6TH
> From: k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:06:22 -0700
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO 27 ?
>
> AMSAT shows downlink at 436.795
>
>
>
> AO27 site shows downlink at 436.797
>
>
>
> What is the correct frequency?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:
en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:58:06 -0400
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO 27 ?
To: Ted <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4BD482AE.104@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ted wrote:
> AMSAT shows downlink at 436.795
>
>
>
> AO27 site shows downlink at 436.797
>
>
>
> What is the correct frequency?
>
>
The difference is "in the noise". It's an FM downlink, so either or both
are close enough to hear it, and the difference may be as much as your
receiver is off frequency. Pick either and adjust for best results on
your individual receiver.
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:19:00 -0500
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO 27 ?
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <2BDD51A77C9D4699B91A0E84435C9EA2@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
I split the difference and plugged 436.796 into the Doppler.SQF file for
SatPC32, but I also use the AFC on my 910H, so it really doesn't matter -
the software takes care of the doppler error, and the AFC takes care of any
error in the actual satellite frequency.
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 12:06 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO 27 ?
> AMSAT shows downlink at 436.795
>
>
>
> AO27 site shows downlink at 436.797
>
>
>
> What is the correct frequency?
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:34:56 -0700
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Hitting a southbound Moon
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W1A6B4934B4A5D79525E45A9050@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi folks,
Now that the Arecibo event is behind us, there is still one puzzle that I'd
like someone to explain to me. How do I aim at the Moon?
I'm on the US West Coast. Early in the pass on Saturday, both Predict and
Orbitron told me that the Moon's azimuth from here should be slightly north
of east. It was in the 80-ish degree range, with east, of course, being 90.
But looking at Orbitron's map display, the Moon was clearly south of my
latitude. As the pass progressed, the Moon moved westward on the map,
making a sharper angle to the south of east from here. Both Predict and
Orbitron's Az calculation increased too (eventually crossing 90 degrees),
but always seemed to be north of where the Moon was.
Why would I aim north to hit a southbound Moon?
Greg KO6TH
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with
Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326
::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO 27 ?
To: k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx D."
<ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <788191.74595.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I start at 436.805 which seems about right for the doppler shift at the
beginning of the pass.
73s John AA5JG
--- On Sun, 4/25/10, Greg D. <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Greg D. <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO 27 ?
> To: k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010, 12:52 PM
>
> I find that 436.795 works best for me.? But it's an FM
> downlink (so you have the capture effect on your side),
> you've got Doppler to deal with, and every rig is different
> anyway.? So I'd advise that you just play with it a bit
> and see what's best for you.? Either one is a
> reasonable starting point.
>
> Greg? KO6TH
>
>
> > From: k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx
> > To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> > Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:06:22 -0700
> > Subject: [amsat-bb]? AO 27 ?
> >
> > AMSAT shows downlink at 436.795? ? ?
> ? ?
> >
> >?
> >
> > AO27 site shows downlink at 436.797
> >
> >?
> >
> > What is the correct frequency?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ???
> ????????
> ?????? ???
> ?
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get
> more from your inbox.
>
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:
en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:51:36 -0400
From: "Nathaniel S. Parsons" <nsp25@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] KPC-9612+ with TS-2000
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<z2me9267a811004251151w59f41f5fzfb21360d96396b54@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the help with our 4800 bps issue. We haven't found a
solution yet, but we're working on it, and I'll let you know when we
have something figured out.
Just now, I found a Kantronics KPC-9612+ lying around the lab, and
would like to fire it up with our TS-2000 to see if it's still in
working order. Can someone check to see if I've figured out the pinout
correctly? I'll put the KPC pins on the left, and the TS-2000 pins on
the right.
1 (Audio out) - 11 (Mic in)
2 (Carrier detect) - 5,7 (Main/sub squelch)
3 (PTT) - 9 (PTT)
4 (CTRLB) - Not connected
5 (RXA) - 1,3 (Main/sub out)
6 (GND) - Any of 4,8,12 (GND)
7 (Ext-In) - Not connected
8 (CTRLA) - Not connected
9 (GND) - Any of 4,8,12 (GND)
TS-2000 pins not connected: 2,6,10,13
Thanks,
Nate KC2SVI
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:56:46 -0400
From: "Nathaniel S. Parsons" <nsp25@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: KPC-9612+ with TS-2000
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<n2we9267a811004251156xd5c24572sac789c22d54c145d@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I should add that I'm using the following pin number connection:
KPC: As you look at the connector on the rear panel, it goes
5 4 3 2 1
9 8 7 6
TS-2000: As you look at the connector on the rear panel, it goes:
13
9 10 11 12
5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Nathaniel S. Parsons <nsp25@xxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for the help with our 4800 bps issue. We haven't found a
> solution yet, but we're working on it, and I'll let you know when we
> have something figured out.
>
> Just now, I found a Kantronics KPC-9612+ lying around the lab, and
> would like to fire it up with our TS-2000 to see if it's still in
> working order. Can someone check to see if I've figured out the pinout
> correctly? I'll put the KPC pins on the left, and the TS-2000 pins on
> the right.
>
> 1 (Audio out) - 11 (Mic in)
> 2 (Carrier detect) - 5,7 (Main/sub squelch)
> 3 (PTT) - 9 (PTT)
> 4 (CTRLB) - Not connected
> 5 (RXA) - 1,3 (Main/sub out)
> 6 (GND) - Any of 4,8,12 (GND)
> 7 (Ext-In) - Not connected
> 8 (CTRLA) - Not connected
> 9 (GND) - Any of 4,8,12 (GND)
>
> TS-2000 pins not connected: 2,6,10,13
>
> Thanks,
> Nate KC2SVI
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 189
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
