| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 13.02.10 22:12l 234 Lines 6447 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB579
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 79
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<F4BWT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 100213/2007Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:39856 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB579
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Sounds from Space - now including Australis-Oscar 5
(Matthias Bopp)
2. Re: Spacewalks (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
3. Re: Spacewalks (Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL)
4. (no subject) (andy thomas)
5. CHASQUI-1 (andy thomas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:57:57 +0100
From: "Matthias Bopp" <matthias.bopp@xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sounds from Space - now including Australis-Oscar
5
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <60242EFCCC514DBD8B699A688C574A48@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hello,
thanks to Chris VK3AML the "Sounds from Space" collection at www.dd1us.de
now includes recordings of Australis Oscar 5. I hope you will enjoy it.
I am still missing recordings especially of
OSCAR II
OSCAR III
OSCAR IV
Amsat Oscar 8
RS-1 to RS-4
Any contributions or hints where I may ask for are very welcome.
Best regards 55&73
Matthias DD1US
www.dd1us.de
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:33:26 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Spacewalks
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20100213092806.00c36f98@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 09:14 AM 2/12/2010 -0800, Elan Portnoy <elanportnoy@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm sure you don't mean "intercept" but monitor.
>
>Have a look at this page http://www.orbitessera.com/html/space_shuttle.html
>
>Has the frequencies listed--never tried to copy them myself.
>
>Elan - WB2IOL
That page hasn't been updated in a while.
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:34:23 -0700
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Spacewalks
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20100213092951.00c40c30@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 05:55 PM 2/12/2010 +0000, John Heath <g7hia@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>Spacewalks are easy to monitor. Your regular 2m antenna will work.
>In the UK we get some interference from Air band Communications but can
>generally get a good part of the conversation.
>
>Note - It only works with the Russian spacesuits. American suits use a
>different system.
>
>73 John G7HIA
Do you know what frequencies their helmet camera's use? It might be
interesting to see if video cam be captured.
KB7ADL
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:16:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] (no subject)
To: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: daniel.brandt@xxxx.xx.xx.xxx john heath <g7hia@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <277552.15410.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I came upon an interesting comment about batteries at the web blog of
Cosmonaut Maxim Suarev which is in English at Russia Today:
http://rt.com/About_Us/Blogs/orbital-log/2010-02-09.html
The blog was from someone working on a Peruvian cubesat called CHASQUI-1.
The specific question is:
"Lizeth Bodero
10 February, 2010, 14:24
hi!! I'm a science student and here in my University we are building a
nanosatellite named "Chasqui". We hope to launch it this year but there's a
problem with the batteries since we wanted to use lithium polymer batteries
and we don't know if those are allowed by the Russian Federal Spacial
Agency. Do you have any suggestion about that? thank you so much
"
Someone on the group might have the answer? Looks like they have already
identified a launch vehicle...
There are wiki entries and a web page for CHASQUI-1, although the onboard
comms system isn't described here is a description of the ground station:
http://www.chasqui.uni.edu.pe/html/eng/ground-station.html
Frequency bands: VHF (144 - 146 MHz.) and UHF (435 - 438 MHz.)
Operating Mode: Half duplex
Transmitting power: 50 W.
Modulation: AFSK
Link Speed Downlink: 1200 bps. and 9600 bps.
Link speed increase: Between 1200 bps. and 9600 bps.
73 de andy g0sfj
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:20:36 +0000 (GMT)
From: andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] CHASQUI-1
To: amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <334341.14846.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Fw: I forgot to title this CHASQUI-1, sorry
--- On Sat, 13/2/10, andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
> From: andy thomas <andythomasmail@xxxxx.xx.xx>
> Subject:
> To: "amsat" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: "john heath" <g7hia@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, daniel.brandt@xxxx.xx.xx.xx
> Date: Saturday, 13 February, 2010, 17:16
> I came upon an interesting comment
> about batteries at the web blog of Cosmonaut Maxim Suarev
> which is in English at Russia Today:
>
> http://rt.com/About_Us/Blogs/orbital-log/2010-02-09.html
>
> The blog was from someone working on a Peruvian cubesat
> called CHASQUI-1.? The specific question is:
>
> "Lizeth Bodero
> 10 February, 2010, 14:24
>
> hi!! I'm a science student and here in my University we are
> building a nanosatellite named "Chasqui". We hope to launch
> it this year but there's a problem with the batteries since
> we wanted to use lithium polymer batteries and we don't know
> if those are allowed by the Russian Federal Spacial Agency.
> Do you have any suggestion about that? thank you so much
> "
>
> Someone on the group might have the answer? Looks like they
> have already identified a launch vehicle...
>
> There are wiki entries and a web page for CHASQUI-1,
> although the onboard comms system isn't described here is a
> description of the ground station:
>
> http://www.chasqui.uni.edu.pe/html/eng/ground-station.html
>
> Frequency bands: VHF (144 - 146 MHz.) and UHF (435 - 438
> MHz.)
> Operating Mode: Half duplex
> Transmitting power: 50 W.
> Modulation: AFSK
> Link Speed Downlink: 1200 bps. and 9600 bps.
> Link speed increase: Between 1200 bps. and 9600 bps.
>
> 73 de andy g0sfj
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 79
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
