OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   10.02.10 22:04l 85 Lines 2355 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB576
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 76
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<ON4HU<DB0RES<ON0AR<HS1LMV<CX2SA
Sent: 100210/2002Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:39238 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB576
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: New Lindy's QRV (Bill Dzurilla)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:41:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Lindy's QRV
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <411919.10209.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Ed,

Congrats, it seems like you are in business if you heard the bird down to
the horizon.  HO-68 is louder, in some cases much louder, than most of the
other sats, so check some others.  If you can copy SO-50 to the horizon,
then leave your antenna alone, it's working great.

I measured a maximum of 20w directly at the antenna, and Elk claims a gain
of 6.6 dbd on 2m, which would mean an ERP of 90 watts.  I do not need full
power at high elevations.

73, Bill NZ5N
> From: Edward Cole <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Lindy's QRV
> To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Message-ID: <201002092025.o19KPAPG010369@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
> format=flowed
>
> One more update:
>
> I tried pass #744, this morning and copied a big
> round-table of
> several west-coast stations, but was unable to break
> in.? My downlink
> was as loud as them, so...?? I had one call to my CQ
> right at LOS and
> could not complete, sorry!? Bear with me as I am
> getting reaquainted
> with running my radio on satellites ;-)? My sub-VFO
> tuning control is
> not working which complicates netting with another
> station.? So I
> find my signal with the Rx and then engage tracking.?
> That tracks for
> a little while.
>
> The interesting thing is that I copied signals to
> zero-elevation.? I
> would say that I am pleased with the new antennas.
>
> Question: what ERP are most stations using on SSB on
> HO-68?? I am
> running 50w ERP.
>
>
>
> 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
> ======================================







------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 76
***************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 02.04.2026 17:44:34lGo back Go up