| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 18.01.10 22:04l 115 Lines 3548 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB533
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 33
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<F4BWT<F1BBI<CX2SA
Sent: 100118/2003Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:33722 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB533
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Doppler correction - HRD 5.0 compared to SatPC32
(Bato, Andras)
2. Re: Chinese GPS system (Rocky Jones)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:37:21 -0000
From: "Bato, Andras" <bato@xxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler correction - HRD 5.0 compared to
SatPC32
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <006701ca9854$2025bf60$7500a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Hello Jan PE0SAT,
I have tried both software with my FT-847.
Before I state which is my favourite, I must let you know about my
correspondence with the authors.
Simon and Erich helped me a lot when I started to test their products, so I
am really grateful to them.
When I use SatPC32 it is just like I were on an HF band, no difference. HRD
V5.0 seems to be a bit too complex as a whole.
That's why I prefer Sat32PC and I can recommend to everyone for satellite
activity.
gl de ha6nn
Andras
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:27:47 -0600
From: Rocky Jones <orbitjet@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Chinese GPS system
To: <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>, Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL106-W293D503236988F806BC3CAD6660@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hmm...it certainly would under certain circumstances raise the noise floor
for a space RX...but a lot would depend on the analysis given the
spacecrafts orbit RX antenna, etc. I can see times when the affect would
not be that bad. I assume that the PRC vehicles will have some sort of
"beam shaping"...
Robert WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL
> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:54:17 -0500
> From: rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Chinese GPS system
>
> Mode L anyone?
>
> We will lose that entire region as an uplink in an upcoming WARC would
> be my current estimate.
>
>
>
>
> On 1/18/2010 4:02 AM, Trevor . wrote:
> > China launched the navigational satellite BeiDou-2 a couple of days ago.
The system is reported to use 1256.52-1280.52 MHz
> >
> > http://www.southgatearc.org/news/january2010/china_launches_beidou2.htm
> >
> > 73 Trevor M5AKA
>
>
>
> --
> (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
> Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
> NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
> "the only people for me are the mad ones,
> the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk,
> mad to be saved, desirous of everything at
> the same time, the ones who never yawn or
> say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
> like fabulous yellow roman candles" Kerouac
> Twitter:rwmcgwier
> Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 33
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
