| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 09.01.10 11:01l 900 Lines 26172 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB515
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V5 15
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<XE1FH<CX4AE<CX2SA
Sent: 100109/0851Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:31417 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB515
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Ham Radio University (Clint Bradford)
2. Re: Galileo Contract Awarded (Bob McGwier)
3. Re: Galileo Contract Awarded (Bob McGwier)
4. Re: HO-68 Schedule Jan 10-17 (Tim Tuck)
5. 7 Messages to H ope-1 BBS in one pass, with attached files
photos (1ST TIME) (Nader Omer)
6. Re: FO-29 Schedule (Mineo Wakita)
7. Re: Galileo Contract Awarded (Peter Guelzow)
8. HO68 - FM mode, QSO VA3-SP7 (Mateusz)
9. AO-7 QSO 7694 Km (ps8rf Piraja)
10. Re: probably simple (Trevor .)
11. FW: AO-7 QSO 7694 Km (ps8rf Piraja)
12. Re: Winter Project (George Henry)
13. Re: Galileo Contract Awarded (Rocky Jones)
14. Re: probably simple (Tony Langdon)
15. Re: Winter Project (Roger Kolakowski)
16. Re: AO-7 QSO 7694 Km (Bob- W7LRD)
17. Re: [eu-amsat] Re: Re: HO-68 BBS upload!! (Mark L. Hammond)
18. what did I hear? (francesco messineo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:21:12 -0800
From: Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Ham Radio University
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <D269162E-412E-4845-BB96-FDA8DACA04EB@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> ... presentation and demonstration ... 01/10/10 ...
hamradiouniversity.org ...
OUTSTANDING, PETER!
It has been great sending email messages back and forth with you last year.
Then actually speaking with you on your VOIP net last week.
NEXT: Actually meeting you!
You'll do great at the hamvention. Just be yourself - you've got the right
attitude and enthusiasm. Have a pad and paper handy for any Q&A inquiries
that you cannot immediately answer for your audience: They'll appreciate the
fact that you promise to get 'em the answers via email ASAP.
Clint, K6LCS
909-241-7666
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:23:38 -0500
From: Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
To: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4B47944A.6030904@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Such a shame. I hope they are not still overselling the amount of
revenue it can or will generate from sales of premium services as a
means to lie their way to funding for birds/launches.
Next, I thought Martin was no longer chairman of SSTL but very happy to
see it go to Surrey if it has to go anywhere at all.
Bob
N4HY
Trevor . wrote:
> Russian-built Soyuz rockets will send up the satellites in batches of two
from October 2012. By early 2014 it is anticipated there will be 16
satellites in orbit, see
>
> http://www.southgatearc.org/news/january2010/sstl_wins_galileo_bid.htm
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
--
(Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"the only people for me are the mad ones,
the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk,
mad to be saved, desirous of everything at
the same time, the ones who never yawn or
say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow roman candles" Kerouac
Twitter:rwmcgwier
Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:30:34 -0500
From: Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
To: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4B4795EA.9000302@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Trevor:
You call it "the other issue" but it is the only issue. They do not
give a tinker's damn if they interfere with us (and I suspect they
won't) but the ability to sell receivers with CRAP for front ends (in
terms of dynamic range, IMD, etc.) making it cheaper to manufacture is
severely hampered by the "licensed stations" in adjacent bands. There
will be regulatory relief sought for the "health and safety" etc.
services provided by Galileo from those stinking pest hams who are
simply obeying the law on their licensed systems.
I am still of the opinion that this system serves no useful purpose
whatsoever except to say "us too". It is a political impossibility to
turn on SA now in my opinion but now there will be no need to at all. I
suspect a treaty guaranteeing no SA and no allowance for design and sale
of jamming equipment would be a LOT cheaper than this system.
Bob
Trevor . wrote:
> --- On Fri, 8/1/10, Ulip ?eljko <Zeljko.Ulip@xxxxxxxx.xx> wrote:
>> Many congratulations to Sir Martin Sweeting and his team.
>> But, what will be hapend with the 23 cm band world wide
>> after Galileo system will be in the orbit?
>> Please take a look to the document below:
>>
http://galileo.khem.gov.hu/documents/angol/technikai_dokumentumok/status_of_ga
lileo_frequency_and_signal_design.pdf
>
> It'll raise the noise floor which could affect satellite based 1260 MHz
receivers. The other issue could be the jamming of Galilleo GPS receivers by
Amateurs using 1260-1300 MHz, see
>
> Potential Interference To Galileo From 23cm Band Operations
> http://www.southgatearc.org/articles/galileo.htm
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
(Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"the only people for me are the mad ones,
the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk,
mad to be saved, desirous of everything at
the same time, the ones who never yawn or
say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow roman candles" Kerouac
Twitter:rwmcgwier
Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:19:14 +1100
From: "Tim Tuck" <timt@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HO-68 Schedule Jan 10-17
To: Alan Kung <alankung@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4B47AF62.9090901@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Alan,
I have some questions regarding HO-68..
Would it be possible to reschedule HO-68 for Australia and New Zealand
at more appropriate times around the 22:00UTC passes ?
Its currently not operating , in our corner of the world, around the
22:00UTC timeframe, that is morning for us, and it would be nice to be
able to use it during daylight hours. The current times are near 10pm at
night for us or midnight+ for New Zealand !
Also, why does it need a schedule, is there not enough power to operate
24/7 ?
thanks
Tim
--
VK2XTT :: QF56if :: BMARC :: WIA :: AMSAT-VK :: AMSAT
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:38:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Nader Omer <st2nh@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 7 Messages to H ope-1 BBS in one pass, with
attached files photos (1ST TIME)
To: amsat bb bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <750724.24212.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I succceded to upload 7 messages to BBS on board hope-1 oscar satellite in one
pass!
Orbit # 323
time 18:42- 19:02
date 8-01-2010
locator KK65GP
Messages to
dk3wn 2 messages one with attached photo
hb9ska
message to all
message to ba1du
message to w0sl
message to je9pel
see the photos for more
http://picasaweb.google.com/Nader.st2nh/7MessagesToHope1BbsInOnePassWithAttach
ed\
PhotoFile1stTime#
73 de??Nader ,?st2nh
?
www.st2nh.com
?
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:50:38 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Schedule
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <1012F8FB44684B8AA34564349E951ECD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
reply-type=original
FO-29 should come out of the eclipse soon.
JARL still are making an effort hard the examination use.
A operating schedule will be announced soon.
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:28 +0100
From: Peter Guelzow <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4B47B90C.2070402@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
The answer is very simple: There will be - no Soyuz test launches -
from Kourou....
It's a proofed and robust rocket. There are already commercial customers
booked for the first flight..
Otherwise P3-E would be on it.. ;-)
73s Peter DB2OS
On 08.01.2010 17:51, Bill Ress wrote:
> Aaah - good point and worth exploring. Now all we need are some
> contacts. Anyone have any suggestions?
>
> Regards...Bill - N6GHz
>
> Trevor . wrote:
>
>> --- On Fri, 8/1/10, Bill Ress <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I would guess with the controversy regarding our 1296 MHz
>>> band operations and Galileo, we wouldn't be in good standing
>>> with the Galileo folks so looking for ride share
>>> opportunities would be out of the question???
>>>
>> I'm presuming the launches will be from the Russian launch site at Kourou ?
>>
>> Given it's a new site and the Russian haven't launched from a tropical
climate before I'd imagine there'd be some test launches first.
>>
>> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:06:50 +0100
From: "Mateusz" <sq7dqx@xxxxxx.xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HO68 - FM mode, QSO VA3-SP7
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4581CF6DA5EB4704A58AC2B94066A9F0@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2";
reply-type=original
Record is edited to save ears from noise and it is short:
http://www.enduro.idl.pl/audio_sat/va3fm_ho68_08012010_2240UTC.mp3
There were a longer pauses between transmisions caused by interferences.
VA3FM - thanks for QSO.
Matt SQ7DQX
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:14:07 +0300
From: ps8rf Piraja <ps8rf@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-7 QSO 7694 Km
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT121-W63B5F56A74D38793E21DB8E0700@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello all,
I posted a short video with the contact maintained today with Andre, ZS2BK
via AO-7 in mode B ( Orbit 60848 - 19:47 UTC - 01/08/10 ). We keep the QSO
with a small window that the AO-7 has provided us. The window was only about
34 sec, this time interval we could not match any commit error. The distance
between the two stations is 4085 miles or 7669 Km.
Andre wrote via email: "
"My Doppler calc was also gratefully spot on. For example I calculated that
I should call so that my downlink is on 145.944.2 mhz
I worked out that our Doppler difference would be 3.8 khz and amazing that
was spot-on. There is really no time to tune !"
Andre is right the time was too little for adjustments. Taking also into
account that I manually worked the rotor and control of my rig.
See the sound/video in youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNFmHERisWQ
I hope you enjoy it
73,
Piraj?, PS8RF
_________________________________________________________________
O Novo Windows 7 funciona do jeito que voc? quer. Clique aqui para conhecer!
http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows7/default.html?WT.mc_id=1539
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:50:15 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: probably simple
To: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, Pete Rowe
<ptrowe@xxxxx.xxx>, Edward Cole <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <707068.86693.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
--- On Fri, 8/1/10, Edward Cole <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> The rate of change of Doppler is a
> sinusoidal function, so...
>
> Think of a sine wave: the change in amplitude is highest
> close to the zero crossing and smallest around the plus
> and minus maximums.
The graphs at http://www.qsl.net/vk3jed/doppler.html
show this well.
Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:19:36 +0300
From: ps8rf Piraja <ps8rf@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FW: AO-7 QSO 7694 Km
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <SNT121-W19C59CE44BE03DFFE85D27E0700@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sorry, the Correct distance the is 7694 Km
73
Piraja, PS8RF
From: ps8rf@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: AO-7 QSO 7694 Km
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:14:07 +0300
Hello all,
I posted a short video with the contact maintained today with Andre, ZS2BK
via AO-7 in mode B ( Orbit 60848 - 19:47 UTC - 01/08/10 ). We keep the QSO
with a small window that the AO-7 has provided us. The window was only about
34 sec, this time interval we could not match any commit error. The distance
between the two stations is 4085 miles or 7669 Km.
Andre wrote via email: "
"My Doppler calc was also gratefully spot on. For example I calculated that
I should call so that my downlink is on 145.944.2 mhz
I worked out that our Doppler difference would be 3.8 khz and amazing that
was spot-on. There is really no time to tune !"
Andre is right the time was too little for adjustments. Taking also into
account that I manually worked the rotor and control of my rig.
See the sound/video in youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNFmHERisWQ
I hope you enjoy it
73,
Piraj?, PS8RF
Quer ver seus e-mails de todas as contas num lugar s?? Junte todas elas no
Hotmail.
_________________________________________________________________
Deixe seu computador compat?vel com a sua vida. Clique para conhecer o
Windows 7!
http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows7/default.html?WT.mc_id=1539
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:36:24 -0600
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Winter Project
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <5BE1E2BBD5AE4151A9B770BAED44B8F3@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original
I may have some of the tubes that have been mentioned in this thread laying
around.... about 25 years ago, I picked up a dead railroad Prog Line at the
Wilkes Barre hamfest and, after discovering that the power supply section
was seriously fried, I scrapped it. However, I saved all the tubes in case
any were a match for an old Motorola tube rig that I picked up around the
same time, and still have in the attic. I also have a lot of old TV tubes
from my dad's "stuff", as well as some spares from a WW II VHF DF set
(BC-639, maybe?).
Will check this weekend if I get the chance.
George, KA3HSW
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:50:37 -0600
From: Rocky Jones <orbitjet@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
To: <peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx>, Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <COL106-W4141012D3825DF07DF4D04D66F0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Peter. this has to have been a win win situation for everyone. It
essentially puts the final nail in the coffin of sea launch, the US has no
real competition to the equatorial launch site...(OK Kwaj but thats still
sometime in the future) and positions "that side of the pond" with a rocket
that can at least take on SpaceX should (and when in my view) the Falcon9
and Falcon9 heavy make it into orbit. Musk has Kwaj (or Australia perhaps I
know he is looking "down there") but the only way The Europeans and Russians
start losing commercial payloads back to "this side" of the pond is if Musk
is a success.
Otherwise not a chance that Delta and Atlas will compete with the systems at
Kourou...
pretty shrewd move Robert WB5MZO
> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:00:28 +0100
> From: peter.guelzow@xxxxxx.xx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
>
> The answer is very simple: There will be - no Soyuz test launches -
> from Kourou....
> It's a proofed and robust rocket. There are already commercial customers
> booked for the first flight..
> Otherwise P3-E would be on it.. ;-)
>
> 73s Peter DB2OS
>
>
>
>
> On 08.01.2010 17:51, Bill Ress wrote:
> > Aaah - good point and worth exploring. Now all we need are some
> > contacts. Anyone have any suggestions?
> >
> > Regards...Bill - N6GHz
> >
> > Trevor . wrote:
> >
> >> --- On Fri, 8/1/10, Bill Ress <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would guess with the controversy regarding our 1296 MHz
> >>> band operations and Galileo, we wouldn't be in good standing
> >>> with the Galileo folks so looking for ride share
> >>> opportunities would be out of the question???
> >>>
> >> I'm presuming the launches will be from the Russian launch site at
Kourou ?
> >>
> >> Given it's a new site and the Russian haven't launched from a tropical
climate before I'd imagine there'd be some test launches first.
> >>
> >> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:46:52 +1100
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: probably simple
To: "Trevor ." <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>, "Mark L. Hammond"
<marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>, Pete Rowe <ptrowe@xxxxx.xxx>, Edward Cole
<kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4b47e023.0d0bca0a.4aef.05e1@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 08:50 AM 1/9/2010, Trevor . wrote:
>The graphs at http://www.qsl.net/vk3jed/doppler.html
>show this well.
Use http://vkradio.com/doppler.html . :)
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:26:33 -0500
From: "Roger Kolakowski" <rogerkola@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Winter Project
To: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>, "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <004a01ca90d3$29b04ec0$0200a8c0@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I keep running across some 832/829B sockets (maybe also 5894) in my pile of
stuff...that means there are tubes somewhere in the same pile...
Roger
WA1KAT
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 7:36 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Winter Project
> I may have some of the tubes that have been mentioned in this thread
laying
> around.... about 25 years ago, I picked up a dead railroad Prog Line at
the
> Wilkes Barre hamfest and, after discovering that the power supply section
> was seriously fried, I scrapped it. However, I saved all the tubes in
case
> any were a match for an old Motorola tube rig that I picked up around the
> same time, and still have in the attic. I also have a lot of old TV tubes
> from my dad's "stuff", as well as some spares from a WW II VHF DF set
> (BC-639, maybe?).
>
> Will check this weekend if I get the chance.
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 QSO 7694 Km
To: ps8rf Piraja <ps8rf@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<1965195458.9060881263016222577.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx.xxxxx
xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hello Piraja and all
Congratulations, a great feat!..? I also am looking forward to a edge to
edge QSO with PA1TNO in JO22li? from CN87wk.? If ever successful it would be
7837km.? The allotted time is around 25 seconds ?I think though to be
successful I might have to increase the height of my satellite array to 50
feet.? This is divorce height, so? efforts will be made at the 18 foot level.
73 Bob W7LRD
Seattle. Wa.
CN87wk
----- Original Message -----
From: "ps8rf Piraja" <ps8rf@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2010 3:14:07 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [amsat-bb] ?AO-7 QSO 7694 Km
Hello all,
I posted a short video with the contact maintained today with Andre, ZS2BK
via AO-7 in mode B ?( Orbit 60848 - ?19:47 UTC - 01/08/10 ). We keep the QSO
with a small window that the AO-7 has provided us. The window was only about
34 sec, this time interval we could not match any commit error. The distance
between the two stations is 4085 miles or 7669 Km.
Andre wrote via email: "
"My Doppler calc was also gratefully spot on. For example I calculated that
I should call so that my downlink is on 145.944.2 mhz
I worked out that our Doppler difference would be 3.8 khz and amazing that
was spot-on. There is really no time to tune !"
Andre is right the time was too little for adjustments. Taking also into
account that I manually worked the rotor and control of my rig.
See the sound/video in youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNFmHERisWQ
I hope you enjoy it
73,
Piraj?, PS8RF ???????????????? ???????? ? ???????????????? ?
_________________________________________________________________
O Novo Windows 7 funciona do jeito que voc? quer. Clique aqui para conhecer!
http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows7/default.html?WT.mc_id=1539
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:31:28 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: [eu-amsat] Re: Re: HO-68 BBS upload!!
To: Thomas Frey <th.frey@xxxxxxx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx eu-amsat@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<5d8cecfe1001081031r6be5df4bi84a506df7580ddd8@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Just Google 'PB PG Linux' and you'll find what's out there...a few
options exit for Linux.
I am not aware of any other Windows options--but you could probably
get the DOS versions of PB and PG going again for fun...(it wasn't
that much fun, by the way!)
73,
Mark N8MH
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Frey <th.frey@xxxxxxx.xx> wrote:
> Luc Leblanc wrote:
>> On 8 Jan 2010 at 18:17, Andrew Rich wrote:
>>
>> Did anyone knows if there is other programs Windows or Linux base able to
emulate WISP!
>>
>
> If you use Linux look for WINE. Google is my friend, good luck.
>
>>
>>> Can these satellite protocols be used on earth ?
>>>
>>> Station to station ?
>>>
>>> Andrew VK4TEC
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I also uploaded a file with WiSP. Hope you can download it OK.
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice if other voice users did not transmit until the
>>>> packet transmission has stopped though.
>>>>
>>>> Patience gentlemen, please.
>>>>
>>>> 73, ?Dave. G1OCN.
>>>> AMSAT 5766
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] HO-68 BBS upload!!
>>>>
>>>> I succeeded in upload a file into BBS using WiSP, the file number was
>>>> 'CB'.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ne.jp/asahi/hamradio/je9pel/xw1_digi.htm#bottom
>>>>
>>>> JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> "-"
>>
>>
>> Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
>> Skype VE2DWE
>> www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
>> DSTAR urcall VE2DWE
>> WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>> <*> ?To visit your group on the web, go to:
>> ? ? ?http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eu-amsat/
>>
>> <*> ?Your email settings:
>> ? ? ?Individual Email | Traditional
>>
>> <*> ?To change settings online go to:
>> ? ? ?http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eu-amsat/join
>> ? ? ?(Yahoo! ID required)
>>
>> <*> ?To change settings via email:
>> ? ? ?eu-amsat-digest@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
>> ? ? ?eu-amsat-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
>>
>> <*> ?To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> ? ? ?eu-amsat-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
>>
>> <*> ?Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>> ? ? ?http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen, Regards, 73
> ? ? Thomas Frey, HB9SKA
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ? Thomas Frey, Holzgasse 2, CH-5242 Birr, Tel. + Fax: 056 444 93 41
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://home.datacomm.ch/th.frey/
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:48:33 +0100
From: francesco messineo <francesco.messineo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] what did I hear?
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<d9f2bc21001090048h22342f7bne1f6afc405c57191@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi all,
I'm just listening for a SO-67 pass and the satellite seems not
operational at this time (8:40 UTC) but around 435.355 MHz +/- doppler
I started hearing a kind of cw telemetry in short intervals. They are
6 letter "packets" or so, like ISUN44. I didn't copy other packets as
I was busy trying to identify the satellite with the tracking program,
but it must not be one of my "favourite" ones.
What was I hearing?
Thanks
Frank IZ8DWF (currently in JM49MG).
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 15
***************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
