| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 20.09.09 21:13l 47 Lines 1268 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB4485
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 485
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<ZL2BAU<N9PMO<N6RME<CX2SA
Sent: 090920/1907Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:3963 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB4485
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ITAR sucks (Jean-L. RAULT)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:40:53 +0200
From: "Jean-L. RAULT" <f6agr@xxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ITAR sucks
To: Rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4AB5CE75.40306@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
RFI-EMI-GUY a ?crit :
> I noticed the Iranian satellite payload on their recent launch contained
> many Mini-Circuits modules. I wonder how that came about?
>
>
Are these RF modules classified as ITAR or as Dual Use ?
If they are Dual Use, the EAR De Minimis rule applies, which means that
if the price of the components is less than 10% of the total price of
the payload, no export licences are required for the Mini-Circuits US
manufacturer.
Jean-Louis F6AGR
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 485
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
