| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 17.09.09 06:01l 778 Lines 22762 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB4475
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V4 475
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<HG8LXL<CX2SA
Sent: 090917/0355Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:3120 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB4475
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Satellite AX25 transmission on the 435 MHz band? (Bat? Andr?s)
2. N8MH demonstration AO-51 QRP FM05 9/17/09 23:09UTC pass
(Mark L. Hammond)
3. QRP repeater now active (Andrew Glasbrenner)
4. Maxim 2633 preamp (Ronald Long)
5. Re: Maxim 2633 preamp (Bruce Robertson)
6. RS series mode A downlink power (Andrew Glasbrenner)
7. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (w4upd)
8. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (Andrew Glasbrenner)
9. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (Tony Langdon)
10. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (James Duffey)
11. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (Tony Langdon)
12. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (John W Lee)
13. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (Tony Langdon)
14. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (James Duffey)
15. Re: true duplex radios (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
16. Re: accidental satellite ops (Auke de Jong)
17. Re: RS series mode A downlink power (Tony Langdon)
18. Re: KB9BIT DM86/87 (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
19. Re: true duplex radios (John Geiger)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:57:21 +0000
From: Bat? Andr?s <bato@xxxxxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite AX25 transmission on the 435 MHz band?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4AB15131.7050805@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Gentlemen,
Are there any satillite in life which sends telemetry data or anything
else in AX25 mode on its downlink frequeny on the 435 MHz band?
gl de ha6nn
Andras
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:51:37 -0400
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] N8MH demonstration AO-51 QRP FM05 9/17/09 23:09UTC
pass
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4ab17a0a.02c3f10a.5989.113b@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello All,
Tomorrow night (Thursday night 9/17 AOS is around 7:09PM Eastern/23:09UTC) I
will be attempting a demonstration of AO-51 at the Johnston Amateur Radio
Society monthly club meeting north of Benson, NC.
I'll be in grid square FM05 operating portable on the QRP repeater (145.880
up, 435.150 down). Any contacts will be appreciated and well received by me
and the club :)
[If the QRP repeater isn't active, I'll be on the normal 145.920/435.300
repeater.]
Please listen for November-Eight-Mike-Hotel in Fox Mike Zero Five.
73,
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:59:11 -0400
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] QRP repeater now active
To: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4AB17BCF.8090106@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
The 145.88/435.150 repeater on AO-51 for QRP users is now active. Please
observe the 10 watt and handheld or omni antennas only guidelines.
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:24:04 -0400
From: Ronald Long <rlong3@xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Maxim 2633 preamp
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090917012411588.XZIC3319@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
I wonder if anyone has done a pcb for the Maxim 2633 preamp article
which appeared in the May/June Amsat Journal? thanks ron
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:55:58 -0300
From: Bruce Robertson <ve9qrp@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Maxim 2633 preamp
To: Ronald Long <rlong3@xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<49657a760909161855i4dfc75dyb9eb509ab66f7a41@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Ronald --
I'm afraid I haven't, but I'm really impressed with the one-off cost
of www.batchpcb.com "$10 setup fee (per order - appears as a handling
fee), 2 layer - $2.50/sq. inch 4 layer - $8.00/sq. inch". If you could
get some Eagle files from someone, perhaps this service might help.
(If anyone has experience with this or other similar shops, I'd love
to hear about it.)
73, Bruce
VE9QRP
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Ronald Long <rlong3@xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
> I wonder if anyone has done a pcb for the Maxim 2633 preamp article
> which appeared in the May/June Amsat Journal? thanks ron
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:59:22 -0400
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] RS series mode A downlink power
To: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4AB197FA.8050800@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Anyone with any firm data on the downlink power from RS10-13 on 29MHz? A
cursory reference check and Google didn't turn anything up. I'm thinking
maybe this was a telemetered value and someone remembers?
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:14:58 -0400
From: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4AB19BA2.3070001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
As per the Satellite Experimenter's Handbook 2nd edition:
Power output: 5 watts for RS10/11
Power output : 8 watts PEP for RS-12/13
Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
> Anyone with any firm data on the downlink power from RS10-13 on 29MHz? A
> cursory reference check and Google didn't turn anything up. I'm thinking
> maybe this was a telemetered value and someone remembers?
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.101/2376 - Release Date:
09/16/09 11:21:00
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:24:24 -0400
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4AB19DD8.7000501@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Perfect! Thank you!
73, Drew KO4MA
w4upd wrote:
> As per the Satellite Experimenter's Handbook 2nd edition:
>
> Power output: 5 watts for RS10/11
> Power output : 8 watts PEP for RS-12/13
>
>
>
> Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
>> Anyone with any firm data on the downlink power from RS10-13 on 29MHz? A
>> cursory reference check and Google didn't turn anything up. I'm thinking
>> maybe this was a telemetered value and someone remembers?
>>
>> 73, Drew KO4MA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.101/2376 - Release Date:
09/16/09 11:21:00
>>
>>
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:33:53 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4ab1a01c.0707d00a.1bd3.70b2@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 12:14 PM 9/17/2009, you wrote:
>As per the Satellite Experimenter's Handbook 2nd edition:
>
> Power output: 5 watts for RS10/11
> Power output : 8 watts PEP for RS-12/13
Interesting, I had better results on RS10 than RS12/13. Was RS10's
uplink more sensitive?
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:36:07 -0600
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb
<AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <02F85FBE-4E6D-4DE1-B2FE-35A2B3114BB5@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
RS10/11 was a wonderful bird, with a high orbit and relatively high
transponder power, it was very easy to work and the coverage was quite
wide. It was a perfect beginner's satellite and a lot of guys got
started in satellite operation with RS-10/11.
It is too bad the Russians have not been able to continue this series.
They took over the LEO/MEO activity from AMSAT when AMSAT decided to
concentrate on HEOs and took it in a new and exciting direction.
I still think that the discussions we have over LEO vs HEO should be
shifted to linear vs FM birds. Moving people from FM birds to linear
birds opens up a whole new world of satellite operating to them and I
think we would have a lot more satellite enthusiasts if we encouraged
the FMers to try the linear birds. Then the progression to higher
satellites would have a lot more support. - Duffey
O
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:42:09 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4ab1a20a.86c3f10a.2db9.ffffa978@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 12:36 PM 9/17/2009, you wrote:
>RS10/11 was a wonderful bird, with a high orbit and relatively high
>transponder power, it was very easy to work and the coverage was quite
>wide. It was a perfect beginner's satellite and a lot of guys got
>started in satellite operation with RS-10/11.
I loved RS-10, it was my first bird, and one of the best I've ever
worked. ALso, I actually have gear for Mode A SSB/CW, but not the other
modes.
>I still think that the discussions we have over LEO vs HEO should be
>shifted to linear vs FM birds. Moving people from FM birds to linear
>birds opens up a whole new world of satellite operating to them and I
>think we would have a lot more satellite enthusiasts if we encouraged
>the FMers to try the linear birds. Then the progression to higher
>satellites would have a lot more support. - Duffey
The prob with the modern SSB birds is the equipment is expensive for
thos of us who don't already have 70cm SSB in something we
own. However, a lot of people here have old 2m SSB radios around, so
another RS-10, with that level of performance would fill a step up
gap from FM. I'd certainly be into that bird.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:00:47 -0800
From: John W Lee <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090916.190103.172.5.k6yk@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RS 10/11 worked out real good for me.
I was doing a lot of travelling in 1987-90,
and was able to make a lot of mobile QSO's
using an IC-230 (10 watts on CW) with one frequency
in the middle of the passband, quarter wave antenna on
the uplink, and receiving on an FT-301 with Hustler
10-meter mobile antenna. Amazing !
I was keying the PTT through the accessory jack and
a Vibroplex bug ! And the CW sounded good, too !
73
JOhn K6YK
--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:33:53 +1000
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
Message-ID: <4ab1a01c.0707d00a.1bd3.70b2@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
References: <4AB197FA.8050800@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
<4AB19BA2.3070001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
At 12:14 PM 9/17/2009, you wrote:
>As per the Satellite Experimenter's Handbook 2nd edition:
>
> Power output: 5 watts for RS10/11
> Power output : 8 watts PEP for RS-12/13
Interesting, I had better results on RS10 than RS12/13. Was RS10's
uplink more sensitive?
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
____________________________________________________________
$5,000 a Week For Life
Publishers Clearing House winner annouced on NBC. Enter now.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=QfbBFEUXayxk0mzPpJ34ngAAJ1CmZcBa
4CCYwgQDaZ1FJwo1AAQAAAAFAAAAAArXIzwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACQGZAAAAAA==
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:08:17 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: John W Lee <k6yk@xxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4ab1a82b.85c2f10a.64d3.74c4@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:00 PM 9/17/2009, John W Lee wrote:
>RS 10/11 worked out real good for me.
>I was doing a lot of travelling in 1987-90,
>and was able to make a lot of mobile QSO's
>using an IC-230 (10 watts on CW) with one frequency
I used to run 10W SSB into a vertical on RS-10, and receive on a
random bit of wire across the garden. This setup worked well. Never
got the same results on RS-12/13, even with 25W SSB, except when I
aimed a beam at the bird.
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:11:17 -0600
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <3D193B14-433A-4A36-9FB2-FF82D3C5BB1D@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Tony -
On Sep 16, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Tony Langdon wrote:
>
> The prob with the modern SSB birds is the equipment is expensive for
> thos of us who don't already have 70cm SSB in something we
> own.
Used multimodes for 432 MHz and older 432 MHz transverters are
serviceable and not that expensive if you do some searching. The
linear birds are well worth the investment in my opinion; it is a big
step up in capability. - Duffey
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:16:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: true duplex radios
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <20090917031634.47C5933C87@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
It's too late for me now, for this trip, but how many of these radios
can be set up so that one tuning knob can change both the VHF and UHF
frequencies? My IC-W31 separates VHF and UHF so two knobs are
necessary. Three of my Yaesu transceivers can store VHF and UHF
freqencies in one memory location, but they're not full-duplex.
Are any of these HT's or mobile rigs computer controllable so Doppler
correction can be done that way?
73, doug
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:21:11 -0500
From: Andrew Koenig <ke5gdb@xxxxx.xxx>
Here's my attempt of to update the list of full duplex capable radios.
Did I
miss anything?
HTs -
Icom IC-W2A
Icom IC-W31A
Icom IC-W32
Icom IC-Z1A
Icom IC-X2A (440MHz/1.2GHz)
Yaesu FT-470
Yaesu FT-530
Yaesu FR-51R
Kenwood TH-D7
Kenwood TH-75A
Kenwood TH-77
Kenwood TH-78
Alinco DJ-G5T
Alinco DJ-580T
Alinco DJ-G7
Mobile rigs -
Kenwood TM732
Kenwood TM733
Kenwood TM741
Kenwood TM742
Kenwood TM941
Kenwood TM942
Kenwood TM-D700/710
Yaesu FT-4700
Yaesu FT-5100
Yaesu FT-5200
Yaesu FT-8800
Yaesu FT-8900
Icom 2728H
Icom IC2800
Icom IC-2340
Icom IC-2720
Icom IC-2820
Icom IC-Delta-100
Heathkit HW-24/HW-24A
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:34:46 -0600
From: "Auke de Jong" <sparkycivic@xxxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: accidental satellite ops
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <01aa01ca3747$cdc0f0e0$6400a8c0@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
maybe the best one can do is to send QSL cards noting the time/freq/sat/mode
to the ops. Of course this assumes that their callsign can be understood
----- Original Message -----
From: <w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:46 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] accidental satellite ops
>
>
>
> I noticed yesterday while AO-7 was in mode B over the US there were
> several stations who were working the VHF contest this weekend. The
> downlinks sigs were LSB and obviously oblivious they were uplinking to
> AO-7. I emailed some of them, maybe we can create some accidental
> satellite aficianados.
>
>
>
> 73 Bob W7LRD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.98/2371 - Release Date: 09/14/09
17:52:00
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:23:50 +1000
From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RS series mode A downlink power
To: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: James Duffey <jamesduffey@xxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <4ab1ae83.02c3f10a.5989.5b1d@xx.xxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:11 PM 9/17/2009, James Duffey wrote:
>Tony -
>On Sep 16, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Tony Langdon wrote:
>
>>
>>The prob with the modern SSB birds is the equipment is expensive for
>>thos of us who don't already have 70cm SSB in something we
>>own.
>
>Used multimodes for 432 MHz and older 432 MHz transverters are
>serviceable and not that expensive if you do some searching. The
>linear birds are well worth the investment in my opinion; it is a big
>step up in capability. - Duffey
They still command a fair price over here. :(
73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:44:19 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: KB9BIT DM86/87
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<2e18ad3e0909162044q1295490ds10b0b3b6383d4b67@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Tom!
> I will plan to make two trips to the DM86/87 grid boundary which
> is the OK-CO state line about 6 miles north of my current QTH
> in DM86. ?This will depend on the weather.
>
> I plan to be on:
>
> 16 Sept on AO-51 ?for the 23:57 pass
> 17 Sept on SO-50 for the 00:47 pass
>
> 19 Sept on SO-50 for the 00:05 pass
> 19 Sept on AO-51 for the 00:17 pass
Thanks for showing up on SO-50 this evening from the state line
(and grid boundary). Good luck on the rest of your trip.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: true duplex radios
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
<faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <606322.31277.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I can think of a few HTs that were missed:
Icom
W21AT
X21AT (70cm/23cm)
Delta 1-(2m/70cm/23cm)
Alinco
DJ560
DJ582
Kenwood
TH79
TH89 (70cm/23cm)-Try to find one
Plus a few Standards, and the ADI AT-600
73s John AA5JG
--- On Wed, 9/16/09, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@xxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: true duplex radios
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 10:16 PM
> It's too late for me now, for this
> trip, but how many of these radios
> can be set up so that one tuning knob can change both the
> VHF and UHF
> frequencies?? My IC-W31 separates VHF and UHF so two
> knobs are
> necessary.? Three of my Yaesu transceivers can store
> VHF and UHF
> freqencies in one memory location, but they're not
> full-duplex.
>
> Are any of these HT's or mobile rigs computer controllable
> so Doppler
> correction can be done that way?
>
> 73, doug
>
> ???Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:21:11 -0500
> ???From: Andrew Koenig <ke5gdb@xxxxx.xxx>
>
> ???Here's my attempt of to update the list
> of full duplex capable radios. Did I
> ???miss anything?
>
>
> ???HTs -
> ???Icom IC-W2A
> ???Icom IC-W31A
> ???Icom IC-W32
> ???Icom IC-Z1A
> ???Icom IC-X2A (440MHz/1.2GHz)
> ???Yaesu FT-470
> ???Yaesu FT-530
> ???Yaesu FR-51R
> ???Kenwood TH-D7
> ???Kenwood TH-75A
> ???Kenwood TH-77
> ???Kenwood TH-78
> ???Alinco DJ-G5T
> ???Alinco DJ-580T
> ???Alinco DJ-G7
>
> ???Mobile rigs -
> ???Kenwood TM732
> ???Kenwood TM733
> ???Kenwood TM741
> ???Kenwood TM742
> ???Kenwood TM941
> ???Kenwood TM942
> ???Kenwood TM-D700/710
> ???Yaesu FT-4700
> ???Yaesu FT-5100
> ???Yaesu FT-5200
> ???Yaesu FT-8800
> ???Yaesu FT-8900
> ???Icom 2728H
> ???Icom IC2800
> ???Icom IC-2340
> ???Icom IC-2720
> ???Icom IC-2820
> ???Icom IC-Delta-100
> ???Heathkit HW-24/HW-24A
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 4, Issue 475
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
