| |
PA2SNK > PACKET 26.04.16 20:34l 94 Lines 3910 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 3998_PA2SNK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re:Winpack vs. Outpost
Path: IZ3LSV<IK6IHL<IK7NXU<HB9CSR<IK2XDE<DB0RES<PI8CDR<PI8SNK
Sent: 160426/1915Z 15338@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
From: PA2SNK@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
To : PACKET@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to PA2SNK SNEEK
# On : 26-4-2016 21:14:50
# UTC: 26-4-2016 19:14:50
>R:160426/1630Z 15332@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
>R:160426/1622Z @:PI8CDR.#DRE.NLD.EURO #:37216 [Westerbork] $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1622z @:DB0RES.#NRW.DEU.EU $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1622z @:IK2XDE.ILOM.ITA.EU $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1622z @:IZ3LSV.IVEN.ITA.EU $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1627z @:IW8PGT.ICAL.ITA.EU $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1622Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:42763 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1620Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:2512 [Caterham Surrey GBR] $:91838_N0KFQ
>R:160426/1619Z 91838@N0KFQ.#SWMO.MO.USA.NA BPQ1.4.65
>
>
>Last week I announced that I was replacing my Outpost User
>program with Winpack in order to "take another look at Winpack".
>This has been done and I have some interesting information (my
>opinion, of course) to share with you. First, to "level the
>playing field", Outpost has some "specialized" operating
>functions that are of interest, not to the "general purpose"
>packet operator, but to packet operators working in those
>"specialized" fields. These functions were not evaluated and were
>not included in this analysis. This evaluation is for "general
>purpose" packet operations and operators.
>
>The bottom line first.. It was found that Winpack could do almost
>all of the things that Outpost could do..
>
>Send and receive p-mail and bulletins.. YES
>Send and receive NTS messages (With add-on) YES
>Send and receive Packet-to-Winlink messages.. YES **
>Send and receive Packet-to-Email messages.. YES **
>Send P-Mail, Winlink, E-Mail from a "Distribution List".. YES **
>Send and receive all messages using Automatic mode.. YES
>Allow "copy-and-paste" in P-Mail, Winlink, and Bulletins.. YES
>Append prepared "signature" to any or all messages.. YES
>Keep, Delete, or Archive any or all messages.. YES
>Automatically address "REPLY TO" messages (except E-Mail).. YES
>Choice of "REPLY" to either Topic or Sender.. YES
>Ability to "FORWARD" messages to another User.. NO
>Contains an "Address Book".. YES
>Ability to switch between RADIO and TELNET connections.. YES
> ** = Using a BPQ bbs.
>Winpack is MUCH more efficient at retrieving messages from a BBS.
>Winpack is able to "quote" messages in a REPLY function.
>Winpack message ARCHIVE is more efficient and easier to maintain.
>Winpack message ARCHIVE does not slow down message retrieval.
>Outpost is MUCH better at FORWARDing messages.
>Outpost is able to send messages to multiple addressees.
>Winpack E-Mail messages from a Distribution List are sent Bcc.
>Winpack "compose" function will automatically format line-length.
>Winpack will run in all Windows 32-bit systems. (Ask for info).
>
>For "general purpose" use, I have found Winpack to be a
>formidable contender for Outpost.
Hi K.o. and other readers.
All things you mention can also be done with TsTHwin.
Missing function only is telnet.
But LU7DID wrote a little program to use with agwpe so maybe it could be
used together.
Also Sally 7 is a great prog but a bit hard to configure.
What you did not mention is the auto decode in winpack of 7+ msgs !
Also there's a 7+ coder in winpack.
In TsThwin there's only a coder and for decoding you should use auto7p
(win32)
But if you dont use 7+ it works fine without.
Sally 7 and TsTHwin work in x64 os's
о о
о о
ооо ооо
оооо оооо
оооооо оооооо
оо ооооо оо
о ооо о
ооооооо ооооооо
оооооооо оооооооо
PA2SNK te Sneek/Snits (Friesland)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
