| |
G0TEZ > PACKET 01.12.11 21:42l 27 Lines 831 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 440115G0TEZ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G6KUI> before Winpack
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DK0WUE<7M3TJZ<JK1ZRW<JE7YGF<F6CDD<GB7CIP
Sent: 111201/1611Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EU #:18606 [Caterham Surrey GBR] $:440115G0
From: G0TEZ@GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EU
To : PACKET@WW
Thanks for coming back on the subject of NPFPMS, I notice you're on2.54c.
I can find nothing wrong wth NPFPMS except it was too good for what I
wanted. I did swap messages with G8NPF but he seems to have disappeared
now.
As for BPQ that was no big problem. I don't blame you for staying with
NPF, if I still had an AE I would be still with TPK 1.83d (unless there is
a later version).
I did briefly try Sally, it was what I expecteds then, after a few weeks
I went back to NPFPMS like you, after that, because packet was very busy
with ;oads of BBSs, digipeaters and nodes. It needed an extra node like a
hole in the head. I went back to the simpler TPK.
Best regards.
73 - Ian, G0TEZ @ GB7CIP
Message timed: 16:01 on 2011-Dec-01 GMT
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
