OpenBCM V1.08-5-g2f4a (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IZ3LSV

[San Dona' di P. JN]

 Login: GUEST





  
G0CJM  > USERS    03.11.09 14:15l 199 Lines 8252 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 9D0514G0CJM
Read: GUEST
Subj: RE:G0TEZ's commets on poem
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<HB9TVW<F4BWT<GB7COW
Sent: 091103/1127Z @:GB7COW.#44.GBR.EU #:46131 [177206] FBB7.01.35 alpha
From: G0CJM@GB7COW.#44.GBR.EU
To  : USERS@WW

> From        :VE3WBZ@VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM
> To          :USERS @WW
> Date/time   :03-Nov 01:46
> Message #   :177185
> Title       :RE:G0TEZ's commets on poem
> Path: !GB7COW!F4BWT!F4DUR!CX2SA!VK2DOT!VE3UIL!
> R:091103/0146Z @:VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM #:29300 [Ballantrae] $:29300_VA3BAL
> 
> From: VE3WBZ@VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM
> To  : USERS@WW
> 
> TO:USERS @WW
> FR:VE3WBZ@VA3BAL.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM
> 
> DT:Monday,November 2nd.,2009 @ 1817hrs JPST
> o Grace
> << Quoting G0TEZ to USERS @WW >>
>> From         : G0TEZ          To           : USERS @WW
>> Type/Status  : B$             Date/Time    : 01-Nov 14:43
>> Bid          : 34029-GB7FCR   Message #    : 29139
>> Title        : RE: G6YFF comments on Poem
>>
>> I know I read this as part of a bulletin from Peter but,
>> because I don't read anything from either of the two Andies,
>> or to YL, I have obviously missed the invective.

So did i but i did see the very uncalled for poem to Grace. Grace hasnt
mentioned it to me as all the Chimmies are in my NOT FROM. Grace does have
the NOT FROM but im not sure if she has gor round to programming it. The
content was uncalled for imv and a few more BBS should ban the Chimmies.
> 
> Hello Ian.,
> 
>   Thank you for reading YL @W ...hope ou don't get too sick
> on those recipes sent in by Michael and others, and as for
> the Poem about or to or whatever Rodge, it wasn't posted in
> YL @WW and justice was swift for the poster.
> 
>> I am sure Grace must have some kind of NOT FROM option on
>> her packet prog.

As said she does. But ladies like to bakwa.
> 
> If she does, then she might be lucky.  I do not have that
> option and in any case, I like to sample the morning offerings
> on the local packet station.
> 
>> When I had an aerial (they are verboten where I live now)
>> I used TPK which had an excellent QRM remover. The only two
>> I ever had in my list were G1NNB with his constant blasts
>> against 7Plus and bulls which were too big, and a G6??? in
>> Telford.
> 
> We're into community battles with new developments seeking
> to rid the area of antennas and they usually have a clause
> written into the sale, so one is stuck with cable....but
> fear not we are winning.   Besides , never stopped me.
> 
> I really don't mind G6??? ....or anyone, but there is a limit.
> OK on George blasting the 7Plus....OH dear I did that too
> and I think he blasted me for a monster K ....but any of
> the exchanges with George G1NNB have been comment and
> opinion, and left at that ....  Oh dear, I still have
> not tried 7Plus....my packet program is used for
> telephone dial-up BBSes....  I use it cuz I like it.
> 
>> When I removed the rejects, the G6 had disappeared and
>> George had quitened dow a lot.
> 
> It comes and goes, Ian ...you and I suppose everyone
> knows that.    No real news there.
> 
>> In there place appeared GM7HUD and G0FTD who were just
>> plain rude. I don't remember what they actually called me
>> along with several others but something about "council
>> house yobs" came in to it.
> 
> Aah the Two Andys.  "Beach-Buggy-Boy" is in my thoughts
> as being the poster of the best rude to smut seen on
> packet, and I found it funny in his rant towards George
> he even was stupid to include his rude gesture, that I
> have only seen from him and no other.
> 
> But then Ian, with all the rest on here .... ignoring them
> and concentrating on those who are on, and in the threads
> is the most rewarding.   Over the years, proven with the
> mumerous friends WE all have via packet.   You have to
> admit, you look forward to them posting, as I do.
> 
>> With Winpack + Telnet, it is mot as easy as TPKs 'block
>> and forget'. Occasionally, a callsign pops up, so it's a
>> matter of delete before reading, which has worked quite
>> well - I can recommend it.
> 
> I will try to get the most up-to-date copy and give it
> a whirl ...but I have work and chorse and an HF antenna
> to instal before the freezer door is opened, and CANADA
> takes on it's other name ....  "The Great White North".
> SNOW...and COLD.    So then it might be fun inside
> playing with the program, and making a fool of myself
> and having a great time.
> 
>> There is no one left worth blocking. G4EBT sends out reams
>> of rant, mostly aimed at what he calls "racism" but that
>> is because of his Hindu daughter in law. It's as simple as
>> that. With David it is a question of start to read then
>> hit 'delete' when your eyes start to glaze over.
> 
> Nothing wrong in some cases with David's posts, except
> when he gets into these moods, and if it has something
> to do with only having a daughter who is a Hindu, then
> what nation is that, and look around the world, as this
> or that religious whatever bombs the other.     One day
> he might settle down and think things out on the racism
> thing.    I thought he was baseing it on a party,
> membership or supporter or voter.... equals= Racist.
> 
> Take a good look at the partys in power today, and before
> in our Democratic countrys and look at their examples of
> racism.   Still goes on to a degree...like turning a
> blind eye to pleas for help in .....
> 
>> With Warren and a lot of others, there is a lot I just
>> don't understand. I suspect there is a lot of sneaky
>> emailing going on behind the scenes.
> 
> Warren is an American.    Who understands the colonists?
> <<< There!   That will wake up Warren < snicker> >>>>
> 
> There is NO sneaky emailing going on.   So n so emails
> me, and I return an email.  Same as I do with you.
> 
>> Peter VE3WBZ is on my from list (when it works). Sensible,
>> even handed, no chips on his shoulder; the way packet used
>> to be. In the 90s there were a lot like him but they slowly
>> disappeared. In the zeroes we have a high proportion of
>> diehard, blow hard, whingers and snobs but there is still
>> something to read if you look.
> 
> Oh thanks Ian ... wait until Warren see that!    I can imagine
> the packet posting now, and hahahaha a few emails to boot.
> 
>> Take care. Ian.
>>
>> 73 - Ian, G0TEZ
>> Msg timed: 14:43 on 2009-Nov-01
>> Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
>>
>> [End of Message #29139 from G0TEZ]
> 
>  Ian.   Sooner or later, all the opinions, and counter-counter
> etc opinions and whatever will have flown by your screen and
> mine, and we'll all settle down, to perhaps just sensible
> posting, and I hope heeding the ARRL suggestions of topics
> not to talkabout....and this is because, a few just get too
> carried away.
> 
>  I don't really want anyone to leave.   I perfer they clean up
> their act.    I don't care debating with Bob VK6BE, and YES
> I am emailing him to getting him back, and OK...if only packet
> exchanges with me and Warren < plus frogs >.   Yeah BOB amd
> I get into it...and he and I get hot....but thats it... and
> there is plenty to chat about...other then one sticking point
> that will not move.     This goes also for David G4EBT, which
> I exchange posts with no problem...ok maybe too long for me
> and my quoting .
> 
> What really ticks me off...is this re-editing or not quoting
> a whole passage of someone's post.   No fair in some cases
> but I guess it helps the other for the dog's leg-up ...
> If you know what I mean.
> 
> I even liked your opening the B_P thread.   And most likely
> why all hades broke loose here.    I read the immigration
> policy and agreed with it, and by the time I posted you
> all were on the Consitution < which copy?>.  Got very
> confusing after that and the fur was flying, and charges
> of racism .... for being a member?    Supporter?   Voter?
> 
> Personally I don't like the party and posted as such, and
> WOW you all accepted that, even when I agreed to parts of
> their platform as being thought of over here.... and I
> got an email suggesting membership, as a way to shape
> policy and some of the grey areas.... BUT then thats if
> the extrermists do not have absolute control.
> 
> Well ...Ian...and all ... we're into November.... and
> lets try be sensible .... lets enjoy our packet time
> whenever and the "hobby".
> 
> 73 Peter VE3WBZ

Best wishes, Rodge (g0cjm/g6xcj at gb7cow.#44.gbr.eu)

Somehere in European Union/EEC [E&OE]


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 20.10.2024 10:28:29lGo back Go up