| |
I0OJJ > PACKET 10.05.24 14:30l 20 Lines 674 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : A5YI0OJJ_004
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Is B2 compression better than B1?
Path: IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0NBR<SR1BSZ<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JE7YGF<LU4ECL<I0OJJ
Sent: 240510/1219z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] obcm1.08-6-g5b69
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: PACKET @ WW
X-Info: Received by SMTP-gateway
ut1hzm@ut1hzm.krem.pol.ukr.eu wrote:
> As far as I'm remember F6FBB develop only B0 and B1 protocols,
> as stated on his page: https://www.f6fbb.org/protocole.html
> And B2F is extension created by Winlink-team:
> https://winlink.org/B2F
My attempt to find the original document are vanished:
too many thousands of files disseminated everywhere ...
However I found an original WL2K document dated 2001 and
revised on 2004 which details the 'message structure' and
describe the 'B2 protocol'; I'll send it in 7plus.
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
