| |
VK2TV > USERS 23.01.08 02:01l 42 Lines 1213 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 35201_VK2TV
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: ZL2TZE BBS to Close
Path: IZ3LSV<IW2OHX<I0TVL<F6CDD<F6BVP<VK2TV
Sent: 080122/2344Z @:VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC #:30047 [Kempsey, QF68JX] $:35201_VK
From: VK2TV@VK2TV.#MNC.NSW.AUS.OC
To : USERS@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to VK2TV
# On : 1/23/2008 10:42:20
# UTC: 1/22/2008 23:42:20
>From: UT1HZM@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU
>To : USERS@WW
>
>Hello, Phillip!
>
>>I will be moving to support APRS more
>
>Its very sad to hear again that APRS is killing more and more normal packet
>bbses, nodes :-(
>
>Personally I'm not have something against APRS, more over, they can be live
>together with 'normal' packet in the same PC and even on the same freq, at
>least on VHF...
>
>Nothing bad to beaconing by BBS on APRS freq, to make hope that APRSer
>(in many cases they are 'LIDs' operators) will make some time attention to
>the BBS and finally will be interested in it ;)
>
>
>73, Sergej
APRS can create a lot of traffic, so frequency sharing may not work in a
given area. Packet and APRS are sharing a 2m channel where I live but there
is only one VHF packet user. APRS will be moving to the national frequency
soon. Not because of problems on the packet channel but because travellers
expect to find APRS on the national frequency.
Packet and APRS co-exist on my Linux system, with each having its own
frequencies.
Cheers ... Ray vk2tv
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
