| |
AL0Y > ALL 11.01.21 18:01l 62 Lines 1641 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 184AL0Y
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Suggestion about 7 Plus
Path: IZ3LSV<IK5FKA<IK5FKA<N3HYM<AL0Y<PMS
Sent: 210111/1656Z @:PMS.AL0Y.#NNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM Sally 7.2.048 AL0Y-PMS $:184AL0Y
Message from: AL0Y@PMS.AL0Y.#NNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
Sergej, et all.
Using 7XXXXX as the topic name (like 7Photo, 7Soft) is fine as well
As long as 7 plus files are easy to track.
I only suggested "7 plus" (The space is intended so the word is not
blacklisted) so it's even easier to find.
But both ideas should work. We just all have to agree to ONE convention and
follow it.
As for the filezise, I guess I don't have enough information to comment on
this one. I will leave this to the community. but as long as we all have an
agreement, everyone's life should be easier.
Quoting from a previous message...
>
> Hello, Ali and all.
>
> Most easy solution:
>
> 7plus bulls can be send as 7XXXXX@xxx bull topic.
> E.g.: 7PHOTO@ww, 7PICS@eu, 7SOFT@usa etc...
>
> 7xxxxx - will indicate, that file will be contain some 7 PLUS data.
>
> Also for those sysops, who not like 7 bulls it will be easy to reject
them all
> by include '7*' to reject list.
>
> Would like to talk also about parts size:
>
> there are no sense send tens small 5-10kb parts!
> Better to send less number of parts but say of 20-30Kb size!
>
> Why? Now size not matter for most stations, who FWD over AXIP/Telnet
links!
>
> But who still have fun and FWD via HF low speed modes - its more easy
> to track/stop/reject big size bulls, than try to pass lot of small parts,
> that will in most case waste time/equipment/power to transfer them.
>
> Just my two cents based on long time operation in packet.
>
>
> 73, Sergej.
>
>
>
73 de Aly. AL0Y
(Message sent with Sally 7.2.048)
Timed Mon 11 Jan 2021 16:50 UTC
PMS: AL0Y@PMS.AL0Y.#NNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
