IZ3LSV

I0OJJ  > ALL      16.07.20 18:29l 74 Lines 2867 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : CC141_I0OJJ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Local rules
Path: IZ3LSV<I0OJJ
Sent: 200716/1629z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:19423 $:cc141_I0OJJ

>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Thu Jul 16 18:29:00 2020
Received: from [44.134.32.240] by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.3) with SMTP
	id AA119423 ; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:29:00 +0200
Reply-To: i0ojj@i0ojj.ita.eu
References: <14309_YT7MPB@n6rme.bbs>
>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
Organization: SICD Rome
Message-ID: <68f58c2a-9345-bfc3-0a7b-8f3e192cc141@i0ojj.ampr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14309_YT7MPB@n6rme.bbs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi all,

On 7/16/20 5:49 PM, yt7mpb@yt7mpb.#ns.srb.eu wrote:
> R:200716/1549Z @:N6RME.#NCA.CA.USA.NOAM #:41390 [El Dorado] $:14309_YT7MPB
> R:200716/1549Z 14309@YT7MPB.#NS.SRB.EU LinBPQ6.0.19
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The Amateur radio union of Serbia (SRS), widely known of its stupid
> decisions & regulations, recently announced a new rulebook on performing
> ham examinations in Serbia. Their newest invention is to force the lower
> ham category (named "3rd class") to stay at least for two years in that
> category before being permitted to go for an exam for the upper category
> (named "1st class"). It makes me wonder if a similar rule exist in your
> country. Interestingly, they did not say anything about what they would
> like an applicant to do in the lower category during those two years.
> 
> However, as an alternative to the above (I mean *instead* of those two
> years in the lower category), they offered an exam permission for the
> 1st class to those candidates of the 3rd class who can give valid proofs
> that they had worked at least 100 DXCC countries by modes А1А, Ј3Е. I
> also wonder whether a similar rule exist in your country.
> 
> In my view, it is very unfair to force candidates for the upper category
> to work only А1А and Ј3Е as a 'proof of quality and competence'. What
> about computer-related modes, such as HF pactor, PSK, etc ...? Is it
> good practice to force newcomers to work А1А, Ј3Е if they do not prefer
> telegraphy or SSB voice? What is your opinion and experience?
> 
> Best regards, 73
> 
> Misko YT7MPB


The simpler, the better!

When about the beginning of year 2000 the Europe
Council issued a peculiar CEPT rule, our Government
jumped forward from the old used rules and issued a
single ham category which is provided of a peculiar
document simply named 'General Authorization' and
having the duration of 10 years.
The name 'License' has been removed.

Having deleted the CW test too, as recommended by
the CEPT, remains only to pass a general exam of
usual stuff.

Good for us, and to me too :) is the fully authorized
use of the internet network for all ham activities :)

And other things too ...

-- 
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq



Read previous mail | Read next mail