| |
KF7PSM > PACKET 09.06.20 15:22l 22 Lines 779 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 41141_KE0GB
Read: GUEST
Subj: FX.25
Path: IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<EA2RCF<LU9DCE<LU9HGS<LU1HVK<N7HPX<N3DWB<KE0GB
Sent: 200609/1417Z 41141@KE0GB.#SECO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.20
>From kf7psm%ke0gb.#seco.co.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue Jun 9 16:20:30 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0n) with SMTP
id AA115224 ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:20:30 +0200
Message-Id: <41141_KE0GB@ea2rcf.bbs>
>From: kf7psm@ke0gb.#seco.co.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (ea2rcf @ 94.177.237.192) -> Sending message
Is anyone using FX.25? Would it be possible to upgrade a current tnc's
firmware to support this fec protocol or is it only possible using
a pc? It would be interesting to have some firmware for a tnc that
used standard ax.25 but then upon detection of so many retry's it
changed over to fx.25. Anyway just pondering what's possible I feel
this protocol may be useful on long backhaul links, if any still
exist today!
73 de KF7PSM
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
