| |
N1URO > PACKET 30.03.20 12:42l 24 Lines 838 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 42527_N1URO
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: sooo quiet,
Path: IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<N1URO
Sent: 200330/1131Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:42527 [Unionville] $:42527_N1URO
>From n1uro%n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Mon Mar 30 13:40:42 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0n.beta1) with SMTP
id AA104609 ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:40:42 +0200
Message-Id: <42527_N1URO@i0ojj.bbs>
>From: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (i0ojj @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
To : PACKET@WW
I suppose it's a regional thing. In some areas of EastNet some have actually
dusted off their TNCs looking for something to do. My systems have been
normal as far as usage from what I've seen however most of my usage is NTS
usage.
As long as the RF gets used it's a good thing! Perhaps spread the word that
packet is still a valid means of communications, maybe sysops can generate
some usage again!
73
---
SendBBS v1.1 by N1URO for LinFBB
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
