| |
PA2SNK > ALL 01.02.20 13:00l 65 Lines 2023 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 45944_PI8SNK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Re: KP3FT > MFJ-1278 ok for 6PACK eprom?
Path: IZ3LSV<IK6IHL<IK7NXU<HB9ON<IW2OHX<IR1UAW<I0OJJ<I0OJJ<LU4ECL<PI8SNK
Sent: 200201/0959Z 45944@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
>From pa2snk%pi8snk.#frl.nld.euro@i0ojj.ampr.org Sat Feb 1 11:38:29 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.1) with SMTP
id AA98232 ; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:38:29 +0100
Message-Id: <45944_PI8SNK@xfbb.bbs>
>From: pa2snk@pi8snk.#frl.nld.euro
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (xfbb @ 44.134.32.240) -> Sending message
From: PA2SNK@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
To : ALL@WW
** Message generated by:
** FSG WinFBB Message Editor v2.0b (c)2000 FSG's JO1HDV
--------------------------------------------------------
>R:200131/2145Z @:PI8CDR.#DRE.NLD.EURO #:36 [Westerbork] $:39792_N1URO
>R:200131/2145Z @:VE3TOK.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM #:8821 [Hamilton] $:39792_N1URO
>R:200201/0129z @:VE4KLM.#WPG.MB.CAN.NOAM [Winnipeg] #:36592 $:39792_N1URO
>R:200131/2126Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:39792 [Unionville] $:39792_N1URO
>
>From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
>To : ALL@WW
>
>
>Jeff;
>
>We use 6pack eproms for EastNet/FlexNet in a small variety of proven tested
>TNCs. They primarily consist of the following:
>MFJ-1270
>MFJ-1270B
>MFJ-1270C
>AEA PK-88
>PacComm Tiny II
>PacComm Tiny II mk 2
>and recently we found that the MFJ-1274's supported 6pack fine. One is in
>use at W1EDH on port 1 which links to my N1URO-1 FlexNet system fine. We
>don't have an MFJ-1278 to test with but if the inners are parallel to the
>MFJ-1274, I don't see why it wouldn't work. Give it a go and feel free to
>let me know if it works!
>
>73
>---
>SendBBS v1.1 by N1URO for LinFBB
>
>
6pack for pk88 ?
i thougth there was only 6pack for tnc2 clones.
о о
о о
ооо ооо
оооо оооо
оооооо оооооо
оо ооооо оо
о ооо о
ооооооо ооооооо
оооооооо оооооооо
PA2SNK te Sneek/Snits (Friesland)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
